Read it right there. Flat Earthers are retards. Does that look like the Ukraine to you? Where is the Ukraine. Point it out on that map?
Every single one of them has almost no education. Like the basics. Math. Science. Geography.
Russia still has international flight. Despite of sanctions.
The route takes it over the pole. Flight is diverted due to the Planet's magnetism and cold affecting it.
The flight needs to refuel is the biggest problem.
Until despite of the supposedly less flights and blah blah the climate, They're making a Europe to Sydney in 2 hours. Hypersonic flight is being developed. They tried reentry commerically, but it failed, largely still unmanned, outside of astronauts.
The problem on that route is the pole and refueling.
No, you cannot. At all. Flight tends to avoid it. Completely avoid it. There are very Satellites there. The Planet's magnetism renders compasses, navigation, kaput. Meanwhile there's the obvious weather.
Nowhere near the Pole, yes flight goes to Anchorage, and Greenland. But it doesn't passes by the Pole there.
Your planned route is very close to it. Risk zone. Weather as well.
Aside you have fuel problems. You'd have to refuel. It diverts any path considerably.
You do not need a compass, when you fly in a straight line, level flight. Gyroscopes are used to keep the flight level. Even though you say it is so dangerous, I know not of any commercial airplane crashing when flying over the North Pole.
Flight time from no stop flights from New York to Hong Kong is about 16 hours, and flies daily: within range of fuel capacity of big airplanes.
Also compasses not being useful the closer you get to the North Pole is only natural, as you will be drawing a smaller and smaller circle around the North Pole, making any movement having a bigger impact on the compass needle.
Are you nuts? You don't know where the Ukraine is.
There is no commercial flight anywhere near the pole.
How about you go and Google it. Filling in the missing gaps of your education. Instead of telling me what you think you know.
I get really tired of this forum certain members telling me stuff that is common knowledge. They could Google it in 5 minutes. Instead they write a bunch of crap. Go on Google it.
Not over the pole, avoided. They shout hoohaw it's the pole. Everything in the entire arctic circle, can be vaguely accredited as the pole. Is it over the center, the black circle on that map. It's around it. That distance is actually quite significant, how many miles are we talking from that black circle area, there, to the flightpath. How close to it?
When I saw the former route posted. The airspace is questionable. Again technically, what flight goes over the Pole, through that black circle.
Those concerns were, as stated.
Further concerns are if the airspace remains open. Today's sanctions?
Meanwhile there is another concern coming up in frequency since the airspace opened up. Increasing more recently. Health, the radiation exposure. In the arctic is higher. Whether or not Planet Dystopia cares, most humans would rather holiday. Most humans don't even care if the country went into civil war, they'd only care about their holiday. Well it's becoming any increasing concern and statistic.
If we did an area like the other picture of the South Pole. A continent. Is it similar? One has a better representation. Because it's a land mass. The flight path doesn't go over it.
Read it right there. Flat Earthers are retards. Does that look like the Ukraine to you? Where is the Ukraine. Point it out on that map?
Every single one of them has almost no education. Like the basics. Math. Science. Geography.
Russia still has international flight. Despite of sanctions.
The route takes it over the pole. Flight is diverted due to the Planet's magnetism and cold affecting it.
The flight needs to refuel is the biggest problem.
Until despite of the supposedly less flights and blah blah the climate, They're making a Europe to Sydney in 2 hours. Hypersonic flight is being developed. They tried reentry commerically, but it failed, largely still unmanned, outside of astronauts.
The problem on that route is the pole and refueling.
Yet you can still fly directly from New York to Hong Kong, taking you almost directly over the North Pole.
No, you cannot. At all. Flight tends to avoid it. Completely avoid it. There are very Satellites there. The Planet's magnetism renders compasses, navigation, kaput. Meanwhile there's the obvious weather.
Nowhere near the Pole, yes flight goes to Anchorage, and Greenland. But it doesn't passes by the Pole there.
Your planned route is very close to it. Risk zone. Weather as well.
Aside you have fuel problems. You'd have to refuel. It diverts any path considerably.
You do not need a compass, when you fly in a straight line, level flight. Gyroscopes are used to keep the flight level. Even though you say it is so dangerous, I know not of any commercial airplane crashing when flying over the North Pole.
Flight time from no stop flights from New York to Hong Kong is about 16 hours, and flies daily: within range of fuel capacity of big airplanes.
Also compasses not being useful the closer you get to the North Pole is only natural, as you will be drawing a smaller and smaller circle around the North Pole, making any movement having a bigger impact on the compass needle.
Are you nuts? You don't know where the Ukraine is.
There is no commercial flight anywhere near the pole.
How about you go and Google it. Filling in the missing gaps of your education. Instead of telling me what you think you know.
I get really tired of this forum certain members telling me stuff that is common knowledge. They could Google it in 5 minutes. Instead they write a bunch of crap. Go on Google it.
https://interestingengineering.com/culture/polar-routes-flights-that-go-over-earths-poles
Not over the pole, avoided. They shout hoohaw it's the pole. Everything in the entire arctic circle, can be vaguely accredited as the pole. Is it over the center, the black circle on that map. It's around it. That distance is actually quite significant, how many miles are we talking from that black circle area, there, to the flightpath. How close to it?
When I saw the former route posted. The airspace is questionable. Again technically, what flight goes over the Pole, through that black circle.
Those concerns were, as stated.
Further concerns are if the airspace remains open. Today's sanctions?
Meanwhile there is another concern coming up in frequency since the airspace opened up. Increasing more recently. Health, the radiation exposure. In the arctic is higher. Whether or not Planet Dystopia cares, most humans would rather holiday. Most humans don't even care if the country went into civil war, they'd only care about their holiday. Well it's becoming any increasing concern and statistic.
If we did an area like the other picture of the South Pole. A continent. Is it similar? One has a better representation. Because it's a land mass. The flight path doesn't go over it.