"constitutional crisis" is a way, way waaaaaaay overused phrase. Both sides will go to a court, which will decide. This is like Nixon's tapes. By the time it's decided some 12 months from now, it won't be as important, if at all. By then the executive branch might ignore the court order.
12 months from now, the executive branch will be busy rigging another election. This kind of shit will end up as a couple strongly worded Tweets and then vaporize into the memory hole.
"constitutional crisis" is a way, way waaaaaaay overused phrase. Both sides will go to a court, which will decide. This is like Nixon's tapes. By the time it's decided some 12 months from now, it won't be as important, if at all. By then the executive branch might ignore the court order.
12 months from now, the executive branch will be busy rigging another election. This kind of shit will end up as a couple strongly worded Tweets and then vaporize into the memory hole.
True. But it's accurate. Unlike the term 'Watergate'. Which is designed to numb the mind.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Watergate_complex#Name_origins
It's not a crisis. It's an impasse.
And how is that different? Doesn't the impasse simply cause the crisis? Or is the impasse caused by the crisis?
Crisis mean emergency. There is no emergency.