It is important to note that Graphene Oxide becomes a SUPERCONDUCTOR when it reaches EM levels of just several GB.
GB? Are you sure you don't mean GHz?
Also do you have a citation for that, I've never heard that microwaving graphene oxide makes it a superconductor. I know that graphene by itself (no oxide) is a great conductor on its own. For graphene oxide I've read it can be a not so great conductor. Someone here asked a question about it on Research Gate, and apparently the less oxidized it is the better it can conduct, but graphene by itself would always be superior. https://www.researchgate.net/post/Whether_graphene_oxide_is_a_good_electrical_conductor_or_not
Doctors find these bubbles that connect as a network to be the graphene quantum dots.
I could use a citation on this.
Overall I don't think the way you are presenting this argument is clear or one thing following with another. A lot of what you mention applies to whether or not the parasite class wants to do or is planning to do all these things. Or course they are. The question I have is whether or not these particular shots causing their particular problems are graphene or graphene oxide by and large.
You mentioned a paper about magneto-proteins for mind control, I've seen that too. However it has nothing to do with graphene. I still think graphene could be a red herring or predictive programming. They will roll it out later, but for now they jump the gun on it.
The idea that graphene oxide is less supercoductive than graphine is correct, however, the potential graphene oxide is working with the nerves in the body, so my guess would be that the oxide is important there. I am not a chemist, I have no evidence or experiments on that. I doubt I would find any as it is inhumane to test it. Still, the noticeable neural overstimulation is visible in many vaccinated, just like this one - https://www.bitchute.com/video/rxaJyFCbqQUS/ .
Here's some graphene quantum dots that glow in the dark - https://www.bitchute.com/video/giq5IEG347A7/ . This is important addition, if you want to check specifically the quantum dots... I can speak for a long time just about the fullerine... You should check some more information on graphene and anything connected to it. Just type "graphene" in bitchute and go for the shown experiments. That doesn't mean I would stop helping with information.
The question I have is whether or not these particular shots causing their particular problems are graphene or graphene oxide by and large.
Well, to be honest, I don't know what information you have. So it would be an actual mirracle if all you needed as information came from my comments before you ask specific questions. Ask away, I promised I would deliver anything I have on the topic.
La Quinta Columna has a large database on many vials of the vaccine, you can spot the movement and the creation of a network, including actual chips being made. Of course, they are nano, but they still create the circuitry or have it already in the vial. Don't dismiss them even if you disagree.
You can type graphene oxide in mRNA shots abstract, and review all the links possible of many examples that show the fact that the MESSENGER in mRNA is in fact - graphene oxide. Did you open the last 3 links at the end of the previous comment? I am sure I sent you the downloadable version of the 6 page material concerning that specific thing. It's even at page 666... I wonder how could you miss that?
Make all the connections - people got magnetic on their arm right after the vaccine. Their veins glow in UV light. They can turn on a light bulb by only touching the zone of the injection. Consider that later the graphene is going down towards the legs and arms, thus proving it is denser than blood. And it is why most people think these things to be hoaxes, because they measure incorrectly after a lot of time after the graphene shot.
magneto-proteins for mind control, I've seen that too. However it has nothing to do with graphene.
The graphene is just the tool that makes the mind chip small. Of course, this article doesn't include graphene, or doesn't mention that, because the focus is only the control of the brain ONLY by using magnets. It is better connected to optogenetics - or how the understanding of neurons perfected the neuron manipulation. They can be turned on and off with only shining a UV light. https://news.mit.edu/2022/neuron-excitability-optogenetics-1207 Here's a link on it. I can also send you the mice experiment that makes them zombies, if you haven't seen it, but I also posted it in this site, so you can check it if you haven't seen it.
They will roll it out later, but for now they jump the gun on it.
I understand your point based on your comments, but imagine for a second that you are wrong. Just for a second. Would you feel foolish, if you find out they were smarter and you just got fooled by satanists? Especially, while you think you are ahead and their weapon shoots blanks... You might be right, but let me put forth some arguments:
They never do that. That would mean exposing their actions before they make them. I honestly don't believe you think they are that stupid... //
Now consider the opposite - what if they play the Elon - Neuralink card IN ORDER to play you that they are far away from this and make you complacent? Look - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eK2Hopm5s_c - This is a video of Jose Delgado controlling a bull with a chip in 1965. Why was it aired in 1985? 20 years AFTER the experiment's success?
The media made their biggest hoax and they lost a lot of their viewers. Look at any ratings before 2020 and after. Even normal people dislike seeing fear all the time and they distance from the news. That's why Netflix, Disney, and other online platforms got ahead. They cannot use this card to such an extend again... Think about it. They will never reach the global effect of this again... Unless there's another global event coming up... And then people will think that the media will know what is happening...
This is the most important connection that they are already doing that thing you doubt... Hear it from their own mouths - "surveillance is going UNDER THE SKIN - 0:35" - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o5RbjyicHTU // Yuval Harari - WEF top speaker, also a self-admitted gay jew.
Those papers did not confirm your original claim. So you were confusing several points in your statement about graphene oxide -> "It is important to note that Graphene Oxide becomes a SUPERCONDUCTOR when it reaches EM levels of just several GB."
No, you said Graphene Oxide, it wasn't about what I meant. And the paper you provided on GO didn't confirm your initial statement either.
So you're very unclear on the science you are stating, and you keep changing your story. These arguments you are making are getting long winded and are almost all not properly citing what specifically you needed to cite. So I'm done. But I appreciate your time.
With all due respect, you clearly said GB multiple times, which isn't clearly GHz at all. Really your entire response is showing what I initially stated, that you don't have a solid understanding of the science.
:D You take one mistake I did and go for the beyond proportion scheme? :D Wow, you don't take criticism well, do you? :D
Those papers did not confirm your original claim. So you were confusing several points in your statement about graphene oxide -> "It is important to note that Graphene Oxide becomes a SUPERCONDUCTOR when it reaches EM levels of just several GB."
Care to explain, and not just insult me?
No, you clearly said Graphene Oxide, it wasn't about what I meant. And the paper you provided on GO didn't confirm your initial statement either.
So, now you focus too much on the graphene oxide, and refuse anything about graphene... Interesting state of denial. Not unexpected, just I've never seen one so specific.
You clearly want to find faults in my statements, so you ONLY look for such. Well, enjoy. GOD knows I gave you an honest shot and tried my best.
So you're very unclear on the science you are stating, and you keep changing your story. These arguments you are making are getting long winded and are almost all not properly citing what specifically you needed to cite. So I'm done. But I appreciate your time.
Of course, run away from information. :D It was either that or you could've learnt something that is not copy-pasted opinion of a doctor that made a great impression on you. :D
I wish you could be done. I fear you will spam more of my posts with your nonsense again... Isn't it interesting how you continue to avoid all other topics I've mentioned and stay on a specific case that, in your own mind, is not well understood by you? :D I now know your username is simply ironic. :D Enjoy the rest of what you reap, hypocrite. Your denial of facts doesn't concern me anymore. :D Blocked.
Perhaps you're suffering from some narcissistic delusions, because when confronted with clear evidence you don't understand a topic you run from the truth and gishgallop (or get offended). I recommend praying and repenting about it.
GB? Are you sure you don't mean GHz?
Also do you have a citation for that, I've never heard that microwaving graphene oxide makes it a superconductor. I know that graphene by itself (no oxide) is a great conductor on its own. For graphene oxide I've read it can be a not so great conductor. Someone here asked a question about it on Research Gate, and apparently the less oxidized it is the better it can conduct, but graphene by itself would always be superior. https://www.researchgate.net/post/Whether_graphene_oxide_is_a_good_electrical_conductor_or_not
I could use a citation on this.
Overall I don't think the way you are presenting this argument is clear or one thing following with another. A lot of what you mention applies to whether or not the parasite class wants to do or is planning to do all these things. Or course they are. The question I have is whether or not these particular shots causing their particular problems are graphene or graphene oxide by and large.
You mentioned a paper about magneto-proteins for mind control, I've seen that too. However it has nothing to do with graphene. I still think graphene could be a red herring or predictive programming. They will roll it out later, but for now they jump the gun on it.
Yes, clearly it had to be GHz.
Here's some links to the citations you wanted: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-023-40942-8 (Graphene in 5G environment) https://www.nature.com/articles/nature26160 (Graphene as a superconductor)
Oh, you meant only graphene oxide... Fine here's a link - https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0254058419310673
The idea that graphene oxide is less supercoductive than graphine is correct, however, the potential graphene oxide is working with the nerves in the body, so my guess would be that the oxide is important there. I am not a chemist, I have no evidence or experiments on that. I doubt I would find any as it is inhumane to test it. Still, the noticeable neural overstimulation is visible in many vaccinated, just like this one - https://www.bitchute.com/video/rxaJyFCbqQUS/ .
Here's a vial of Pfizer in real time - https://www.bitchute.com/video/46WS1068DIAT/
Here's some graphene quantum dots that glow in the dark - https://www.bitchute.com/video/giq5IEG347A7/ . This is important addition, if you want to check specifically the quantum dots... I can speak for a long time just about the fullerine... You should check some more information on graphene and anything connected to it. Just type "graphene" in bitchute and go for the shown experiments. That doesn't mean I would stop helping with information.
Well, to be honest, I don't know what information you have. So it would be an actual mirracle if all you needed as information came from my comments before you ask specific questions. Ask away, I promised I would deliver anything I have on the topic.
"A Novel Graphene Quantum Dot-Based mRNA Delivery Platform" - Page 666 // https://chemistry-europe.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/open.202000200 (It's a downloadbable .pdf, I thought that would make it easier. Here's a link that doesn't want you to download - https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33829677/ It misses the number of the page though... )
The graphene is just the tool that makes the mind chip small. Of course, this article doesn't include graphene, or doesn't mention that, because the focus is only the control of the brain ONLY by using magnets. It is better connected to optogenetics - or how the understanding of neurons perfected the neuron manipulation. They can be turned on and off with only shining a UV light. https://news.mit.edu/2022/neuron-excitability-optogenetics-1207 Here's a link on it. I can also send you the mice experiment that makes them zombies, if you haven't seen it, but I also posted it in this site, so you can check it if you haven't seen it.
I understand your point based on your comments, but imagine for a second that you are wrong. Just for a second. Would you feel foolish, if you find out they were smarter and you just got fooled by satanists? Especially, while you think you are ahead and their weapon shoots blanks... You might be right, but let me put forth some arguments:
This is the most important connection that they are already doing that thing you doubt... Hear it from their own mouths - "surveillance is going UNDER THE SKIN - 0:35" - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o5RbjyicHTU // Yuval Harari - WEF top speaker, also a self-admitted gay jew.
With all due respect, you clearly said GB multiple times, which isn't clearly GHz at all.
Really your entire response is showing what I initially stated, that you don't have a solid understanding of the science.
Those papers did not confirm your original claim. So you were confusing several points in your statement about graphene oxide -> "It is important to note that Graphene Oxide becomes a SUPERCONDUCTOR when it reaches EM levels of just several GB."
No, you said Graphene Oxide, it wasn't about what I meant. And the paper you provided on GO didn't confirm your initial statement either.
So you're very unclear on the science you are stating, and you keep changing your story. These arguments you are making are getting long winded and are almost all not properly citing what specifically you needed to cite. So I'm done. But I appreciate your time.
:D You take one mistake I did and go for the beyond proportion scheme? :D Wow, you don't take criticism well, do you? :D
Care to explain, and not just insult me?
So, now you focus too much on the graphene oxide, and refuse anything about graphene... Interesting state of denial. Not unexpected, just I've never seen one so specific.
You clearly want to find faults in my statements, so you ONLY look for such. Well, enjoy. GOD knows I gave you an honest shot and tried my best.
Of course, run away from information. :D It was either that or you could've learnt something that is not copy-pasted opinion of a doctor that made a great impression on you. :D
I wish you could be done. I fear you will spam more of my posts with your nonsense again... Isn't it interesting how you continue to avoid all other topics I've mentioned and stay on a specific case that, in your own mind, is not well understood by you? :D I now know your username is simply ironic. :D Enjoy the rest of what you reap, hypocrite. Your denial of facts doesn't concern me anymore. :D Blocked.
Perhaps you're suffering from some narcissistic delusions, because when confronted with clear evidence you don't understand a topic you run from the truth and gishgallop (or get offended). I recommend praying and repenting about it.