It's how the structure changes... From a tube to a 2d plane... Dude, read the whole paragraph... :D
Are you projecting something? Or just very unclear on physics? "Unzipping" is used to describe how a 3d tube is "unzipped", so it can become a 2d plane... Should I really explain terms that are explained in the same paragraph? :D
Anyway, bot. Stay humble. I am not getting mad... you seem confused... :D Why would I get mad about that? Read the whole thing, you might learn something...
I sent you a link with information that you are wrong. You are not willing to accept it? Then reap what you sow, hypocrite.
Obviously, your ignorance doesn't allow you to win this argument, and your arrogance doesn't allow you to lose it. You are a product of your own demise.
Graphene may be carbon, but it is a flat sheet and not a tube. That also requires an electric field and a hell of a lot more material than could be inside a small injection.
Literally, the 2nd sentence from the link
Tour developed a process for “unzipping” carbon nanotubes so that they transformed into graphene.
Your assumption, that the one small injection is not enough, could be easily refuted by the fact that nanotech is using atoms as a scale. How many atoms are you tall? Have you wondered? Now compare those to an injection with 98-99% of graphene nanoparticles?
I would support your claim and even further it, if you would just review the possibility of mine, instead of directly disbelieving it. They don't bank on "one small injection", that's why they focus to "boost" as much as possible every single human.
I only wanted to expand the conversation. I might've started it wrong, but this time I hope to come across in a better way.
And think about the genius of such a scenario. Medical professionals will not spot graphene, since they don't look for it. Engineering prefessionals will not spot it, since they don't know where to look for it.
Remember Daniel's prophesy about the endtimes 2:43 "And whereas thou sawest iron mixed with miry clay, they shall mingle themselves with the seed of men: but they shall not cleave one to another, even as iron is not mixed with clay."
Everything is going digital, even humans. Anyway, I hope I was able to put forth a better argument this time. Let me know what you think.
Absolutely hilarious! :D
It's how the structure changes... From a tube to a 2d plane... Dude, read the whole paragraph... :D
Are you projecting something? Or just very unclear on physics? "Unzipping" is used to describe how a 3d tube is "unzipped", so it can become a 2d plane... Should I really explain terms that are explained in the same paragraph? :D
Anyway, bot. Stay humble. I am not getting mad... you seem confused... :D Why would I get mad about that? Read the whole thing, you might learn something...
Yeah, you don't even understand what I was saying to begin with about graphene and carbon nanotubes. Go back and re-read.
I sent you a link with information that you are wrong. You are not willing to accept it? Then reap what you sow, hypocrite.
Obviously, your ignorance doesn't allow you to win this argument, and your arrogance doesn't allow you to lose it. You are a product of your own demise.
Now stop bothering people.
Ok I'll bite. What claim do you think I made, and what in the article proved that wrong? Please quote me and the article.
You:
Literally, the 2nd sentence from the link
Your assumption, that the one small injection is not enough, could be easily refuted by the fact that nanotech is using atoms as a scale. How many atoms are you tall? Have you wondered? Now compare those to an injection with 98-99% of graphene nanoparticles?
I would support your claim and even further it, if you would just review the possibility of mine, instead of directly disbelieving it. They don't bank on "one small injection", that's why they focus to "boost" as much as possible every single human.
I only wanted to expand the conversation. I might've started it wrong, but this time I hope to come across in a better way.
And think about the genius of such a scenario. Medical professionals will not spot graphene, since they don't look for it. Engineering prefessionals will not spot it, since they don't know where to look for it.
Remember Daniel's prophesy about the endtimes 2:43 "And whereas thou sawest iron mixed with miry clay, they shall mingle themselves with the seed of men: but they shall not cleave one to another, even as iron is not mixed with clay."
Everything is going digital, even humans. Anyway, I hope I was able to put forth a better argument this time. Let me know what you think.