Win / Conspiracies
Conspiracies
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Conspiracies Conspiracy Theories & Facts
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

10
In a response to Laura Loomer, Elon Musk admitted twitter/x gives advertisers a list of users to either support (or not). #fyi (twitter.com)
posted 2 years ago by xolotltlaloc 2 years ago by xolotltlaloc +11 / -1
4 comments share
4 comments share save hide report block hide replies
Comments (4)
sorted by:
▲ 6 ▼
– xolotltlaloc [S] 6 points 2 years ago +7 / -1

Twitter monetization is a trial run for western social credit score.

Find alternatives to twitter - it's not the free speech platform Musk promised. #baitandsiwtch ...comes to mind.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Michalusmichalus 1 point 2 years ago +1 / -0

I made a truth account when the new CEO took over.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– RachelkillsBam 1 point 2 years ago +2 / -1

... he is literally telling her to find advertisers that want to promote on her brand.

Not her fault that most mainstream companies are big pussies.

Further, if you had a company advertising on Twitter, would you want your ads to show up on tweet about "Gender Affirming Care" bullshit? Same thing, but in reverse

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– xolotltlaloc [S] 2 points 2 years ago +3 / -1

... he is literally telling her to find advertisers that want to promote on her brand.

so the revenue share isn't a common pool distributed applicably based on traffic. there is another factor. seems like twitter allows advertisers to selectively not support specific content providers.

if you had a company advertising on Twitter, would you want your ads to show up on tweet about "Gender Affirming Care" bullshit? Same thing, but in reverse

i want transparency.

who's the pussy company that won't support loomer?

permalink parent save report block reply

GIFs

Conspiracies Wiki & Links

Conspiracies Book List

External Digital Book Libraries

Mod Logs

Honor Roll

Conspiracies.win: This is a forum for free thinking and for discussing issues which have captured your imagination. Please respect other views and opinions, and keep an open mind. Our goal is to create a fairer and more transparent world for a better future.

Community Rules: <click this link for a detailed explanation of the rules

Rule 1: Be respectful. Attack the argument, not the person.

Rule 2: Don't abuse the report function.

Rule 3: No excessive, unnecessary and/or bullying "meta" posts.

To prevent SPAM, posts from accounts younger than 4 days old, and/or with <50 points, wont appear in the feed until approved by a mod.

Disclaimer: Submissions/comments of exceptionally low quality, trolling, stalking, spam, and those submissions/comments determined to be intentionally misleading, calls to violence and/or abuse of other users here, may all be removed at moderator's discretion.

Moderators

  • Doggos
  • axolotl_peyotl
  • trinadin
  • PutinLovesCats
  • clemaneuverers
  • C
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2025.03.01 - 9slbq (status)

Copyright © 2024.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy