Where exactly have I ever claimed that the WEF is bad? Provide a direct quote or admit that you are either lying or seriously lack reading comprehension.
Right, right, you are just claiming that Russia is claiming that the WEF is bad, and using that as a talking point to claim that Russia is contradicting itself.
You have no dog in this fight. Right? You have simply attributed motivations and counter motives to countries and people, while using the abstract concept of the WEF as a proxy for claiming evil, while refusing to acknowledge them as having motives of their own.
Perfectly normally thing to do! Like how you are now demanding hat I 'Provide a direct quote or admit that you (I) are either lying or seriously lack reading comprehension'. This all makes sense. Provided that you are weaving a basket out of logical threads of pure nonsense.
Now all the reader needs to do is go along with the feelings that this narrative invokes without a single thought as to context or actual meaning! See! All logically thought out and presented! As any good deception should be.
Recently u/Eisenhorn has taught me how bad the wef are.
https://conspiracies.win/p/16c2DQaRh2/x/c/
I are confused now.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qIxHb7cA6tg
Why I so dumb?
Where did I ever say that the WEF is bad?
You obviously are very confused. At least you admit it.
Time to get help?
I linked to your thread. How did you form that reply?
Are you controlled opposition? Because I don’t like sand. It’s coarse and rough and irritating… and it gets everywhere.
Where exactly have I ever claimed that the WEF is bad? Provide a direct quote or admit that you are either lying or seriously lack reading comprehension.
Right, right, you are just claiming that Russia is claiming that the WEF is bad, and using that as a talking point to claim that Russia is contradicting itself.
You have no dog in this fight. Right? You have simply attributed motivations and counter motives to countries and people, while using the abstract concept of the WEF as a proxy for claiming evil, while refusing to acknowledge them as having motives of their own.
Perfectly normally thing to do! Like how you are now demanding hat I 'Provide a direct quote or admit that you (I) are either lying or seriously lack reading comprehension'. This all makes sense. Provided that you are weaving a basket out of logical threads of pure nonsense.
Now all the reader needs to do is go along with the feelings that this narrative invokes without a single thought as to context or actual meaning! See! All logically thought out and presented! As any good deception should be.
You fucking factious subversive lying freak.