Has anyone gone through his stuff and compared to what actually happened?
If he has proven correct, then what is he predicting for the rest of this year? Or in 2040? Or is he more like a tarot reader/psychic that can't be proven one way or another?
Comments (20)
sorted by:
So….I have not paid for any of his content.
I found him just before the 2020 election. Thought provoking…I thought. Then, I went back and watched all of his content before the plandemic. Then, I went back and watched all of his content before Trump. Hours and hours…
His message has not changed.
For the predictions…he had a video where predicted an army of frogs at the National Mall in small boats, i.e. kek-J6. This was pre-Q, pre Durham boats. No, I don’t have a link, cuz I don’t remember the video.
There are others. Maybe I should have documented my journey, but I didn’t.
He also had a video where he said you are not going to see the death from the shots, Rather, ppl just dying randomly around you. No, I don’t have a link. This was before all of the athletes dying on camera. No, I don’t have a link. But, I promise you this was during the injection mandate BS-early on.
He is an admitted Cathar…which I had never heard of before. One interesting thread is the Oera Linda Book.
It’s a bit like Nostradamus. Easy to see with hindsight.
Early stuff was youtube, switched to bitchute, now focused on substack.
He has endorsed X22 and Q several times. One or more slight mentions of a few others.
I follow cliff-high. Not a cultist, but I take my alt media where I can get it.
He also predicted the big BTC price rise really early (don't have a link).
Not long ago, I listened to two of his shows in a row, like 5 hours of content. By the end, I found it a hellish experience of brain-melting nonsense.
I tried to figure out if he was just delusional and a charlatan, or an actual disinfo agent. He's a disinfo agent, without doubt.
All that Webbot stuff is bullshit and he made a major mistake in the computer science part of it when he was talking about it. I don't recall what it was, but it was something as bad and obvious as someone telling you they wrote a program in C+.
I also tried to figure out what his main mission was. Turns out it's to derail people from study of the Anunnaki. His technique goes something like this:
"Oh, the Anunnaki? Yes, important. But you know what's way more important? The Nommo. The Anunnaki are nothing compared to the Nommo. I remember this one time when I confronted a Nommo scientist in his laboratory in hyperspace and was able to force him to collapse it. Anyway...."
I'm not even kidding about that hyperspace laboratory part. It's instructive to me to find that anyone gives him any credence at all. The big lesson for me is that I have previously and still continue to seriously overestimate the human race.
Right, any disinfo has got to contain some truth, but I always think of it like picking up gold nuggets in a minefield: you have got to know what you're doing, but if you do it can be very profitable.
Frankly, I found Clif High to be particularly bereft of value. I have a very strong interest in the Anunnaki and a good background in that subject, and in one interview he mentioned--as a simple of fact--that Eden was one of ten (?) Anunnaki biodome laboratories. Finally, something to follow up on!
So after like 20 minutes of searching, what did I come up with? Nothing at all. Not "nothing important"--nothing at all. So this "simple matter of fact" had never been written down by anyone, not even Clif High. How much can any serious researcher expect to get from this guy?
On the flip side, I still refer people to disinfo agent Miles Mathis, but only his work before summer 2019, when I feel it completely came off the tracks. I didn't read it but his latest paper on the Maui "wildfires" advances the thesis it was all faked. Jesus.
You know what's funny? I recently came to the conclusion that James Corbett is himself disinfo. I've listened to every one of his audio podcasts and I never, ever noticed until they "activated" him after the Ukraine War started.
His "gag", if you will, is that he thoroughly documents his work. So years and years were spent building up the impression that this guy has a detailed command of all the material and is a disciplined scholar. Which is true, at least until such time and in such way as it needs not to be.
So I heard his Ukraine show and thought, "Good Lord, are the NYT, WaPo and Rachel Maddow his only sources of information on this?" I was quite shocked, and I've actually waited for a "correction" since that time but it's never come.
You can see the technique, though, in the notes for this show:
"If the bad side is so bad we'll never convince you they're good, then we're going to convince you the good side is in on it with the bad side". This is the same technique you see with the Democrats: "Yes, the Democrats are horrible... just like every single Republican and especially Trump. Right, my friends?"
Corbett actually gets outed right away in the comments:
Can any (supposedly) outstanding researcher like Corbett possibly have simply never heard that, or have failed to address it completely? No way, no way at all. That's the tell, where the disciplined scholar needs to miss something.
Well sure, agree to disagree. But you should pause to recognize that it falls right into the pattern. Whenever I find myself in agreement with a lot of "smart" people, I freeze and my eyes begin to dart all around.
If you or anyone reading this is at all curious about how fake the "news" is and the way the world really works, this appears to be a completely fake person: Dmitry Utkin
About the only lead we need is this one sentence:
Of course he hasn't. He's just a boogeyman created in Langley and has no physical manifestion to appear after, during or before 2016. That footnote [18] reads in the wiki as this:
Doesn't actually exist? What is that supposed to mean? I guess it was supposed to blackwash and minimize Wagner back before they did all that damage to the war effort in Ukraine.
But good old reliable Foreign Policy magazine retconned the title of the article, and it's now:
Oh, okay, murky nature. So they're admitting they don't know much about the group? Maybe it's not so much not knowing, it's not having decided what lies it's convenient to tell everyone.
Anyway, let's close with a good laugh. I mean, a good laugh at anyone who believes in Dmitry Utkin, or Krampus, or Belsnickel.
Take a look at this lame pic of "Dmitry" in what FP assures us was the "last time he was seen". Then compare it to this scary-looking fellow. There's also his "passport photo" in his wiki, which looks to have been issued in the 1950's, and one other tiny group photo not even worth linking.
We've all seen way better photos of Sasquatch.
No. The error he made was sharing that he was webscraping. That allowed anyone to add words to change his results. But, he was able to tell that his data was corrupted. ( I can't recall how)
You can watch him on multiple older podcasts give detailed research information on multiple topics.
Edit: Forum Borealis has multiple Cliff High interviews about the Nommo. Very good, it's where he shared the story of why night vision is green... Because red was showing the Nam soldiers demons or something.
LOL... I have not, I have not! Really, it's on me. I just made all the same assumptions we all did, but when I actually took the time to look around....
Maybe that's the only standard I wish people would live up to, the same one that at long last I finally did. Please everyone, actually take the time to look around and you'll probably be shocked at what you'll find! I wish I could say "pleasantly surprised", but there's at least a little of that too :)
No hate against him, he seems like a down to earth prepper, I just haven't had time to watch most of him stuff. If he's legit or if he just predicts vague things that can be interpreted positively by his followers. If he gives any practical dates and predictions that are actually useful.
When he was kicking cancers ass his haters used that time to darken his name and work. And, he definitely had people that did not appreciate his success.
His predictions were based on using the internet to determine the global human collective consciousness using the words most used. ( this actually worked for a time) Someone or someplace then started corrupting his dataset by intentionally using words online. Cliff then wasn't getting good results, but was able to determine that it was sabotage in the way I described above.
His moniker is interesting in relation to his place in the graduated animal farm.
reminds me of the catcher in the rye line.
what if there is an alternate reading of that book, pointing to why it shows up on 'lone-gunman' fall guys ("CIR" aka "CIA"), and along the lines of 'we will be the opposition' and graduated animal farm.