Has anyone gone through his stuff and compared to what actually happened?
If he has proven correct, then what is he predicting for the rest of this year? Or in 2040? Or is he more like a tarot reader/psychic that can't be proven one way or another?
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (20)
sorted by:
Not long ago, I listened to two of his shows in a row, like 5 hours of content. By the end, I found it a hellish experience of brain-melting nonsense.
I tried to figure out if he was just delusional and a charlatan, or an actual disinfo agent. He's a disinfo agent, without doubt.
All that Webbot stuff is bullshit and he made a major mistake in the computer science part of it when he was talking about it. I don't recall what it was, but it was something as bad and obvious as someone telling you they wrote a program in C+.
I also tried to figure out what his main mission was. Turns out it's to derail people from study of the Anunnaki. His technique goes something like this:
"Oh, the Anunnaki? Yes, important. But you know what's way more important? The Nommo. The Anunnaki are nothing compared to the Nommo. I remember this one time when I confronted a Nommo scientist in his laboratory in hyperspace and was able to force him to collapse it. Anyway...."
I'm not even kidding about that hyperspace laboratory part. It's instructive to me to find that anyone gives him any credence at all. The big lesson for me is that I have previously and still continue to seriously overestimate the human race.
Right, any disinfo has got to contain some truth, but I always think of it like picking up gold nuggets in a minefield: you have got to know what you're doing, but if you do it can be very profitable.
Frankly, I found Clif High to be particularly bereft of value. I have a very strong interest in the Anunnaki and a good background in that subject, and in one interview he mentioned--as a simple of fact--that Eden was one of ten (?) Anunnaki biodome laboratories. Finally, something to follow up on!
So after like 20 minutes of searching, what did I come up with? Nothing at all. Not "nothing important"--nothing at all. So this "simple matter of fact" had never been written down by anyone, not even Clif High. How much can any serious researcher expect to get from this guy?
On the flip side, I still refer people to disinfo agent Miles Mathis, but only his work before summer 2019, when I feel it completely came off the tracks. I didn't read it but his latest paper on the Maui "wildfires" advances the thesis it was all faked. Jesus.
You know what's funny? I recently came to the conclusion that James Corbett is himself disinfo. I've listened to every one of his audio podcasts and I never, ever noticed until they "activated" him after the Ukraine War started.
His "gag", if you will, is that he thoroughly documents his work. So years and years were spent building up the impression that this guy has a detailed command of all the material and is a disciplined scholar. Which is true, at least until such time and in such way as it needs not to be.
So I heard his Ukraine show and thought, "Good Lord, are the NYT, WaPo and Rachel Maddow his only sources of information on this?" I was quite shocked, and I've actually waited for a "correction" since that time but it's never come.
You can see the technique, though, in the notes for this show:
"If the bad side is so bad we'll never convince you they're good, then we're going to convince you the good side is in on it with the bad side". This is the same technique you see with the Democrats: "Yes, the Democrats are horrible... just like every single Republican and especially Trump. Right, my friends?"
Corbett actually gets outed right away in the comments:
Can any (supposedly) outstanding researcher like Corbett possibly have simply never heard that, or have failed to address it completely? No way, no way at all. That's the tell, where the disciplined scholar needs to miss something.
No. The error he made was sharing that he was webscraping. That allowed anyone to add words to change his results. But, he was able to tell that his data was corrupted. ( I can't recall how)
You can watch him on multiple older podcasts give detailed research information on multiple topics.
Edit: Forum Borealis has multiple Cliff High interviews about the Nommo. Very good, it's where he shared the story of why night vision is green... Because red was showing the Nam soldiers demons or something.
LOL... I have not, I have not! Really, it's on me. I just made all the same assumptions we all did, but when I actually took the time to look around....
Maybe that's the only standard I wish people would live up to, the same one that at long last I finally did. Please everyone, actually take the time to look around and you'll probably be shocked at what you'll find! I wish I could say "pleasantly surprised", but there's at least a little of that too :)