This video is a few seconds long. See if you can handle what he says here.
https://streamable.com/356zse
Basically says you're a fool for thinking that the shadow sticks proves anything.
If the video is correct, how high is the Sun above the earth and how fast is it moving? None of the FE'ers can answer that question.
How high is the sun? Well, it's not a star, 93 million miles away.
That's certain.
What's not exactly known yet is how high the sun is. Maybe its location is a reflection, who knows what the sun is. But we can observe it.
How can you be certain if you don't know where the sun is?
I think it goes higher at slower speed in June, lower when farthest away from the pole, but faster.
I have measured the 'speed' of the sun from different places and different times and it is always the same.
It's not that no flat earther has even been able to answer, it's just that you're too cog dis and ignorant to understand what I said above. Cog dis pushes new info away. You can't process. You have the wrong question anyway. Look at the earth, there is no curve. There's logic and observations that make it impossible for us to be on a globe
Ok, what is the logic and observations that make it impossible for us to be on a globe?
You can't see it because you are programmed, but it's fucking obvious. The earth is a huge containment facility, and we are the slaves, harvest, experiments, entertainment, whatever.
Yeah I watched the Matrix too. However, I have also spent much of my life exploring the world, sailing, flying, climbing. And while I haven't been all the way around the world I have been very far north and south and am a pretty good navigator. On a clear night, with nothing more than a good clock, I can tell you my latitude and longitude, within a degree or so.
All of that navigation skill requires and proves that the earths surface is curved. At the North pole the north star is directly overhead. At the equator the NothStar is on the Horizon. that is how I tell Latitude.
Please explain how I could tell Latitude using the north star if the Earth was flat?
▼
Glowies_love_me 1 point 9 hours ago +1 / -0
I have measured the 'speed' of the sun from different places and different times and it is always the same.
Really? Wow. I thought the sun would have to change speeds in order for it to work on the FE model.
Yes and that is why the FE model is falsified.
But, we still have the issue of the sun light not being parallel, so...it's not a paradox, it's just that the sun is not 93 million miles away. It's a few thousand miles away.
The Sun's light is parallel. If the sun was only a few thousand miles away it would be trivial with triangulation to determine its distance. So tell me exactly the Suns distance? You already said you can't and that the Sun might be a reflection, Make up your mind.
So, if you have sun tracking data, and you always measure the speed the same, how would you adjust the FE model to reflect what we observe?
The sun light we observe always behaves like local light, as does the moon, showing a single hot spot reflection as you can replicate, and as photos by high altitude balloon confirm. The light from the sun is not as a uniform, parallel light wave, which is what would come from a sun that is 93 million miles away, and the moon, to a much lessor degree.
You need to define 'local light'.
But parallel light waves from the sun, hitting the moon, should result in a shadow that is 2,200 miles across. The size of the moon. This is because parallel light will not wrap and create a soft outer and darker center shadow.
You seem to be confusing laser light and wavelengths with parallel light. Start by defining local light please.
If the video is correct, how high is the Sun above the earth and how fast is it moving? None of the FE'ers can answer that question.
Here is how real scientists figured it out.
https://www.universetoday.com/117843/how-did-we-find-the-distance-to-the-sun/
How can you be certain if you don't know where the sun is?
I have measured the 'speed' of the sun from different places and different times and it is always the same.
Ok, what is the logic and observations that make it impossible for us to be on a globe?
Yeah I watched the Matrix too. However, I have also spent much of my life exploring the world, sailing, flying, climbing. And while I haven't been all the way around the world I have been very far north and south and am a pretty good navigator. On a clear night, with nothing more than a good clock, I can tell you my latitude and longitude, within a degree or so.
All of that navigation skill requires and proves that the earths surface is curved. At the North pole the north star is directly overhead. At the equator the NothStar is on the Horizon. that is how I tell Latitude.
Please explain how I could tell Latitude using the north star if the Earth was flat?
▼ Glowies_love_me 1 point 9 hours ago +1 / -0 I have measured the 'speed' of the sun from different places and different times and it is always the same.
Yes and that is why the FE model is falsified.
The Sun's light is parallel. If the sun was only a few thousand miles away it would be trivial with triangulation to determine its distance. So tell me exactly the Suns distance? You already said you can't and that the Sun might be a reflection, Make up your mind.
It falsifies the FE model.
You need to define 'local light'.
You seem to be confusing laser light and wavelengths with parallel light. Start by defining local light please.