Win / Conspiracies
Conspiracies
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Conspiracies Conspiracy Theories & Facts
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

28
Presenting Unscored - like Removeddit, but for Scored communities and adjacent domains such as patriots.win. Reveal what moderators have removed on this platform. (unscored.arete.network) See Comments
posted 2 years ago by Elvis_Interstellar 2 years ago by Elvis_Interstellar +35 / -7
57 comments share
57 comments share save hide report block hide replies
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (57)
sorted by:
▲ 3 ▼
– Elvis_Interstellar [S] 3 points 2 years ago +7 / -4

His site has been accused of providing browser fingerprints to would be doxxers as well

You mean that one time a year ago when I said JG5's browser doesn't support chat when u/then tried to falsely portray OGrawsaw as an alt based on a sarcastic comment in the chat. Not much of a fingerprint.

And this is not even the same site. It's a subdomain hosting a different open source website.

summary of that 1 year old drama:

  • u/then accuses u/OGrawsaw of being JG5's fed alt (based on a sarcastic message by rawsaw in the chat), says he posesses advanced hacking skills, wants to obtain JG5's home address using packet tracing on timed realtime chat messages of a specific length.

  • I respond to him by saying JG5's browser errors out when trying to use the chat, so it can't be him (that's all I said, not even which browser he uses, I didn't even have that info)

  • JG5 complains that I've revealed his browser fingerprint, so I delete the comment

  • JG5 then uses that deletion as "evidence" against me, claims I'm in cahoots with his enemy's plan to dox him. As for the sensitive "browser fingerprint" - him openly posting archives of that comment clearly indicates otherwise.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ -2 ▼
– Graphenium -2 points 2 years ago +4 / -6

Regardless, you’re not a trustworthy administrator for private data.

You also refuse to explain why you sided with the site’s most prolific shill over 4 of your moderators.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ -2 ▼
– down -2 points 2 years ago +5 / -7

What a smear!

Feds will try to disenchant you from now on u/Elvis_Interstellar , due to your Arete existing. Just ban the disenchanters that lie. Graphenium knows you eventually banned Insurgent for 30 days for making too many anti-Bible-thumper memes.

Insurgent is still banned, and Graphenium is singing his old song.

Dont get demoralized. 21% of ConPro are paid shills and all now want to stop Arete.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– Graphenium 3 points 2 years ago +5 / -2

Wrong, insurgent was (finally) banned because it became painfully obvious that every genuine user on the site wanted him gone, which was largely because I exposed him for the shill he is, despite Elvis’ best efforts to cover for him for 2+ years, including having multiple moderators quit over the issue.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– deleted 2 points 2 years ago +3 / -1
... continue reading thread?
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 2 years ago +4 / -3

GIFs

Conspiracies Wiki & Links

Conspiracies Book List

External Digital Book Libraries

Mod Logs

Honor Roll

Conspiracies.win: This is a forum for free thinking and for discussing issues which have captured your imagination. Please respect other views and opinions, and keep an open mind. Our goal is to create a fairer and more transparent world for a better future.

Community Rules: <click this link for a detailed explanation of the rules

Rule 1: Be respectful. Attack the argument, not the person.

Rule 2: Don't abuse the report function.

Rule 3: No excessive, unnecessary and/or bullying "meta" posts.

To prevent SPAM, posts from accounts younger than 4 days old, and/or with <50 points, wont appear in the feed until approved by a mod.

Disclaimer: Submissions/comments of exceptionally low quality, trolling, stalking, spam, and those submissions/comments determined to be intentionally misleading, calls to violence and/or abuse of other users here, may all be removed at moderator's discretion.

Moderators

  • Doggos
  • axolotl_peyotl
  • trinadin
  • PutinLovesCats
  • clemaneuverers
  • C
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2025.03.01 - ptjlq (status)

Copyright © 2024.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy