Win / Conspiracies
Conspiracies
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Conspiracies Conspiracy Theories & Facts
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

15
()
posted 2 years ago by ghost_of_aswartz 2 years ago by ghost_of_aswartz +17 / -2
2 comments share
2 comments share save hide report block hide replies
Comments (2)
sorted by:
▲ 5 ▼
– Primate98 5 points 2 years ago +5 / -0

In "honor" of Oppenheimer, and to provide some additional context for analyzing the movie, here is Miles Mathis' paper exposing the Trinity test as a fake:

The Nuclear Hoax (1/24/2016 16-page PDF)

For anyone who thinks the world is only as complicated as they now firmly believe it is, you should probably excuse yourself now and leave with that worldview intact. For the rest, the story takes a strange turn....

Miles Mathis, as a few will know, is a very high-level disinformation agent. We can see one of the early signs here, in that paper from seven years ago:

I suspect all tests and events were and are faked.

That's a pretty tall claim, to say the least. Does he back it up? No. He offered this Trinity paper, one on the Bikini Atoll tests, and a bit about Enewetok, Hiroshima, and Nagasaki. I agree that all these were faked, based on the specific evidence concerning them.

But indeed subtle manipulation is at work. The name of the paper is "The Nuclear Hoax", but we're rounding up from 5 to get to a hundred, or a thousand. Is that really reasonable?

Maybe even more importantly, Mathis promotes himself as primarily a mathematician and physicist. Does he have anything--anything at all--to say about the physics of nuclear weapons to show their impossibility or impracticality? No, not a word. Did he just never think about whether all the fakery was necessary because they simply could not be constructed as we are told? Pretty big idea to fail to consider, for such a thoughtful guy.

My point is that this is an early hint at the building theme for Mathis' work: "Everything is fake". That's bad, of course, as bad as believing everything the mainstream tells you is real. The only path is the middle one, where we must exercise critical thought and judgement to discern that which is real from that which is fake.

Bonus: I stumbled across a very deeply hidden link between the Trinity, Hiroshima, and Bikini Atoll events, indicating the same hand behind all the fakery. Actually, the same link includes the Roswell Incident, which was also a big giant hoax.

I don't want to give away the surprise, and anyone can stumble across it just like I did, but I did want to just hammer a bit more on Mathis. I believe one of his functions is to hide these deeper links that, when seen, tend to make the whole Jenga tower fall apart.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Foletado 2 points 2 years ago +2 / -0

https://spectator.org/yes-j-robert-oppenheimer-was-a-security-risk/

permalink save report block reply

GIFs

Conspiracies Wiki & Links

Conspiracies Book List

External Digital Book Libraries

Mod Logs

Honor Roll

Conspiracies.win: This is a forum for free thinking and for discussing issues which have captured your imagination. Please respect other views and opinions, and keep an open mind. Our goal is to create a fairer and more transparent world for a better future.

Community Rules: <click this link for a detailed explanation of the rules

Rule 1: Be respectful. Attack the argument, not the person.

Rule 2: Don't abuse the report function.

Rule 3: No excessive, unnecessary and/or bullying "meta" posts.

To prevent SPAM, posts from accounts younger than 4 days old, and/or with <50 points, wont appear in the feed until approved by a mod.

Disclaimer: Submissions/comments of exceptionally low quality, trolling, stalking, spam, and those submissions/comments determined to be intentionally misleading, calls to violence and/or abuse of other users here, may all be removed at moderator's discretion.

Moderators

  • Doggos
  • axolotl_peyotl
  • trinadin
  • PutinLovesCats
  • clemaneuverers
  • C
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2025.03.01 - qpl2q (status)

Copyright © 2024.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy