Win / Conspiracies
Conspiracies
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Conspiracies Conspiracy Theories & Facts
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

17
NASA did not test the seals on the Apollo spacecraft for the ultra high vacuum of the moon. Man has never left low earth orbit. SPACE IS FAKE AND GAY (media.conspiracies.win)
posted 2 years ago by MOCKxTHExCROSS 2 years ago by MOCKxTHExCROSS +26 / -9
23 comments download share
23 comments share download save hide report block hide replies
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (23)
sorted by:
▲ 3 ▼
– CrazyRussian 3 points 2 years ago +3 / -0

Talking about the RTV, not the metal. Obviously.

First, seems you don't even know what RTV is. RTV is "Room Temperature Vulcanisation". It is a property of material, not material name or brand. It could be rubber, polyurethane, silicone, butadien-stirole, any elastic polymer that will cure at room temperature.

Second. Silicone itself does not outgas at al. It will decompose earlier, than it reach outgasing temperature. Silicone outgasing with reducing amount of material due to loss of atoms or molecules is a complete nonsense, unlike for metal, ice and other substances that at least could outgas into space under specific circumstances.

Third. 2k silicone rubber have silicone oils and solvents in components to make mixing and applying easier. After curing (vulcanisation) this components still present between created silicone polymer chains. Table about outgassing silicone compounds is about evapouration of that componenets from silicone resin, not about silicone itself. Evapouration of thinners and oils does not make silicone rubber weaker or make it loose any sealing properties. But it harmful for vacuum in vacuum chambers. F.e. I have a small vacuum chamber for restoration of vintage cars headlights reflectors with vacuum metal vapour deposition. With fresh gasket for vacuum bell, I geting bad results of deposition, weak adhesion, because of that thinners from 2k silicone that outgas and interfere with metal vapours. I need around 2 days under vacuum to get rid of that nasty substances that contaminate my vacuum, and then silicone gasket works perfectly. It does not evapourate, it just get rid of thinners and comtaminate vacuum. That is why silicone compounds tested for outgasing of additives. Meanwhile even cheap 1k silicone from hardware store will work perfectly in any vacuum. You just need more time to dry it in air, and more time to dry under vacuum. Silicone compounds designed specifically for vacuum gaskets have less additives so have less vacuum contamination. It is all about fucking vacuum chamber contamination, not about silicone disapeearing.

Again and again, you show that you don't want to know how things work. You just found some stupid screenshot and post it here.

What is the source of that screenshot? Where did you get it? Who told you to post it here? Let me guess, you, suddenly, will never answer this questions. :)

Let's hear your list of "acceptable" moonhoax theories

  1. Where is moon soil? Why NASA presented USSR only few dozen grams of moon soil, less than USSR presented to NASA just before? They presumably bring 382 kg of moon soil, but presented only few dozen grams of soil that was suddenly identical to one that USSR presented to NASA.

  2. How Apollo crews was able to walk and stay on foot right after the landing? A week in low gravity conditions does not allow that.

  3. Why huge part of important documentation of Apollo project was destroyed? That is not what people do with documentation of greatest achievement of humanity.

  4. Why after that huge success with heavy duty rockets, great docking expirience and so on, NASA curtailed any long term missions to space and all space station projects? NASA resumed long term missions only with Mir space station.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– MOCKxTHExCROSS [S] 1 point 2 years ago +1 / -0

Why the lame negative attitude dude?

What is the source of that screenshot? Where did you get it? Who told you to post it here? Let me guess, you, suddenly, will never answer this questions. :)

You seem awfully concerned. I'll let you in on a secret. There's a forum just like this, only better, and I copied it from there.

permalink parent save report block reply

GIFs

Conspiracies Wiki & Links

Conspiracies Book List

External Digital Book Libraries

Mod Logs

Honor Roll

Conspiracies.win: This is a forum for free thinking and for discussing issues which have captured your imagination. Please respect other views and opinions, and keep an open mind. Our goal is to create a fairer and more transparent world for a better future.

Community Rules: <click this link for a detailed explanation of the rules

Rule 1: Be respectful. Attack the argument, not the person.

Rule 2: Don't abuse the report function.

Rule 3: No excessive, unnecessary and/or bullying "meta" posts.

To prevent SPAM, posts from accounts younger than 4 days old, and/or with <50 points, wont appear in the feed until approved by a mod.

Disclaimer: Submissions/comments of exceptionally low quality, trolling, stalking, spam, and those submissions/comments determined to be intentionally misleading, calls to violence and/or abuse of other users here, may all be removed at moderator's discretion.

Moderators

  • Doggos
  • axolotl_peyotl
  • trinadin
  • PutinLovesCats
  • clemaneuverers
  • C
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2025.03.01 - qpl2q (status)

Copyright © 2024.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy