Why do they really want people to take this shot so bad.

I gave our leaders the benefit of the doubt, but the more we learned about covid, the more we know they lied. What is the true purpose for this? I know we all have our theories here, but I still think mareks disease is the most logical.

ROFL OH SHIT THIS HAS ME FUCKING ROLLIN (on a rollercoaster of emotions)

https://theconversation.com/vaccines-could-affect-how-the-coronavirus-evolves-but-thats-no-reason-to-skip-your-shot-165960

If more deadly variants of the coronavirus were to arise, lower vaccination rates would make it easier to identify and contain them because unvaccinated people would suffer more severe infections and higher death rates. But that kind of “solution” would come at considerable cost. In effect, the variants would be found and eliminated by letting people get sick, many of whom would die.

Sacrificing chickens was not the solution the poultry industry adopted for Marek’s disease virus. Instead, more potent vaccines were developed. Those newer vaccines provided excellent disease control, and no lethal breakthrough variants of Marek’s have emerged in over 20 years.

What a dumb hoe(authors a male but my statement still stands). No they separate them because all it takes is one infected chicken to kill every single fucking unvaccinated in a pen(is what I always heard). See what I mean though?

There are people out there who fucking HOPE this happens, hope they rot in hell.

I like how they claim in "OVER 20 YEARS". Well thats surprising, they have only known since 2014 exactly what is going on, so thats not alot of time to go back in time and develop a superior vaccine. Even says that first bullet at top.

Marek's disease is characterized by a mononuclear infiltrate within peripheral nerves and other tissues and organs. In the vast majority of cases a diagnosis can be made if the celiac, cranial, intercostal, mesenteric, brachial, sciatic, and greater splanchnic nerves are examined. In diseased birds, these nerves are up to three times their normal diameter.

Lymphomatous lesions, indistinguishable from those of avian leukosis, appear in the gonads, heart, proventriculus, and lungs but are seldom found in the bursa of Fabricius, which in cases of avian leukosis, is the site of most tumor development. Many apparently healthy birds are lifelong carriers and shedders of the virus. The virus is not transmitted in ovo. Marek's disease and avian leukosis (Figs. 14-15 and 14-16) are usually present in the same flock and both diseases also may occur in the same bird. The two diseases were long confused but can be differentiated by clinical and pathologic features (Table 14-6) and by specific viral and antibody tests. Congenital infection does not occur and chicks are protected by maternal antibodies for the first few weeks of life. They then become infected by inhaling virus dust. Epizootics of Marek's disease usually involve adult birds 2 to 5 months old and there is a high mortality rate of about 80%.

You cant go back in time and undo shit, dumbass gen z.

Links this article as proof about using stronger vaccines.... I dont see it anywhere, she counting on her readers to be so stupid they dont actually read it?

Consistent with previous studies, the STL analysis showed that the underlying trend in leukosis condemnation rate has changed over time with rates generally declining after an initial period of increase (Fig. 1). Analysis of the extended linear model further showed that this change over time was statistically significant (χ2 = 23502, df = 145, p < 0.001). Presumably, the introductions of new MD vaccines have had substantial impacts on MD incidence, and so we interpret changes in leukosis condemnation

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0167587715001622?via%3Dihub

Its talking about mareks diseased induced leukosis... ive decided this has to be propaganda. This part gets me too.

In the history of human and animal vaccines, there have not been many cases of vaccine-driven evolution. But in every one of them, individuals and populations have always been better off when vaccinated. At every point in the 50-year history of vaccination against Marek’s disease, an individual chicken exposed to the virus was healthier if it was vaccinated. Variants may have reduced the benefit of vaccination, but they never eliminated the benefit. Evolution is no reason to avoid vaccination.

Ive had to reread this part, so getting vaccinated, getting enlarged vessels and tumors is considered healthy to this person? The new vaccines reduce the effect, but it doesnt stop it..... wouldnt even be a problem if they didnt sacrifice long term goals for short term gains in the first place. But you know, got to profit and everything.