So, if the war has any validity at all, then the 'enemies' in question would be interested in stabilizing the conflict for the next few years.
At the current pace, there is no question we are in a state of global war in its infancy, as the criminals at the helm continue to pound on the war drum and provide endless hostile inputs where diplomacy should be the norm.
With no provision for diplomacy, the only choice for Russia would be to remove the leaders if they can.
So, lets hold a convention in a tiny little ineffective country, let's configure all the air defense of types already proven useless, practically right next to this so called belligerent global threat.
So, in my opinion, if Russia does not decapitate nato at this stage, then the whole thing is being orchestrated by the controlling factors and both parties in the conflict have no intention of being at 'war'
I would do it. Given the stage and intention of the group, it is the only logical course of action.
A completely useless and incorrect submission I don't mind saying.
It is like you have no clue what brought this conflict to where it is, no understanding of the history that produced the situation.
Ignorance and simplicity coupled like a leaf sitting in a puddle.
You do mind saying it, because you just said it. It makes you ignorant.
Decapitation can only occur in actual conflict.
Europe will be there all the same. Like Russia will.
In the meantime a corrupt shithole is a World narrative because it thinks to win what? Ascension. It was a free nation. Now it's in war or conflict. It has only lost. Bore somebody else with your bullshit. The rest of the World doesn't care. Any actual trade has rerouted. The same as any flight paths.
Both Russia and Nato are using it for a proxy conflict where neither will gain anything else apart from more dead Ukrainians. Seriously Russia gains more Russia it isn't Ukraine. Nato perhaps gains Ukraine, and it won't be Ukraine either.
Spurious claims of dead Russians, they signed upto this adopting it into law and battle. It makes little difference there. Unless they're significantly defeated, army destroyed. Much harder to do with a nation committed to its warfare. There is no guarantee a regime change will change its stance either.
Nato aren't committed, because they're not fighting. Simply funding. If it stops it stops. Defeating Nato. No. They're not fighting. No defeat. It will be there regardless. Regardless of dumb Ukrainian narratives assuming of some other victory. The same as Russian narratives.
Embarrassment over a loss. Loss of what. Russia can lose, by withdrawal or defeat. Nato cannot. Unless they actually fight each other.
I am sure you'll try to make another narrative about it. Join that club of bleeding hearts propaganda. How it serves some other lofty goal. Spare us.
blah blah blah, it is like you really have no clue what you are talking about and speak from such a simple perspective you cannot even comprehend the reality involved.
The conflict in ukraine has been brewing for many decades, the actions of the west have never ceased, nato at this stage is the current tooling used that is all, in the past it was other mechanisms, what you fail to recognize is that this is now involving far more than ever before in this west vs east conflict.
Nato is 100% involved, they have been the driving force in this conflict since its inception.
Weak false claims that they are not involved belong nowhere, without nato this conflict would not exist at all.
What you fail to recognize likely due to the blinders you are wearing, is that this is the early stages of a much larger conflict that is currently scaling quickly.
Even when nato discovers they are powerless, Russia will continue to push nato back until the complete collapse of nato occurs and they are no longer a threat. Your refusal to recognize why Russia is in this conflict at all, reveals you to be a spinster telling useless lies.
No you. There is no reality involved, unless you're fighting it. You aren't, you're boring everybody else, not bothered about it. It doesn't affect them. Apart from more taxes, causing them to be bored even more by it. Last time we all checked higher taxes happen anyway. What did you want me to say. It professes to big narratives. They amount specifically to winning something. Neither have. It continues to be boring, uneventful for everybody else on the globe.
If somebody wins something, perhaps it might affect something else. Although I actually cannot think of what. Trade continues. Ukraine aren't trading anything, except dead Ukrainians. Nato and Russia continue to trade regardless.
You're assuming a larger conflict. Some other victory. Not unless they engage outside of a dumb proxy nobody else in the World gives a shit about. It's either part of Nato or partially part of Russia. It isn't anything else.
Nato loses nothing, except the funding. Russia potentially loses some of its army fighting or withdrawing. But Ukraine only loses, all those dead.
You're talking about credibility if there is victory it supposedly causes? Who knows. Not much. There's trade or there isn't. The ability to conduct conflict hasn't changed. Like the ability to fund it. Or sanction it.
You write nothing but garbage, are you a jew?
Criminal minds continually push attempts to subvert good people. Good people in turn continue to fight against criminals.
Much shorter, much more logical.