Infrastructure, with only few exceptions, is of a much lower quality these days. The old buildings were built to last. Maybe the underground bunkers are high quality.
But even if you are correct that an airplane theoretically could bring them down, planes absolutely weren't actually involved. 1) cgi planes. 2) bizarre 'crash' behavior, also cgi. 3) only metal towers in the world that burned that way. 4) all the weird surrounding evidence showing that some kind of unknown energy wrapon was used - the melting cars etc. 'Where did the towers go' video 5) 30,000+ engineers and professionals signed that they doubted the official story.
Infrastructure, with only few exceptions, is of a much lower quality these days. The old buildings were built to last. Maybe the underground bunkers are high quality. But even if you are correct that an airplane theoretically could bring them down, planes absolutely weren't actually involved. 1) cgi planes. 2) bizarre 'crash' behavior, also cgi. 3) only metal towers in the world that burned that way. 4) all the weird surrounding evidence showing that some kind of unknown energy wrapon was used - the melting cars etc. 'Where did the towers go' video 5) 30,000+ engineers and professionals signed that they doubted the official story.
how you going to disrespect the dead and say it was a CGI plane