So you would have sex with a hot hooker who has herpes? Because herpes is a virus and viruses don't exist and viruses are not contagious?
I don't claim to have all the answers, nor am i saying you are 100% correct or incorrect. All I'm saying is that Harry Vox is right in regard to it not passing the bullshit test.
I actually find the studies you link to be intriguing, worth further inspection. For now I am going to keep avoid coughing sneezing people with pox and i'm going to pass on banging the hot hooker who has herpes on her vagina.
ok i think i know what the problem is here. If you put your dink is a bacterial ridden hole then there is most definitely a chance that your sensitive skin will experience irritation. Kinda like when you get something in your eye and you get pike eye.
Things like that can be accidentally attributed to contagious pathogens. its one person getting sick from another. But its far from a "virus" or other particle that causing it. Its the environment/ and or toxins your introduced too.
So when people like me claim that there are no viruses, we are not denying that people can get sick or that people are faking said illness's. what we are saying is that the catalyst that makes the person ill isn't a "virus" because that one has never been proven to exist.
See we know bacteria are real, we can see them and isolate them, same with parasites and fungus. all of those, except the "virus" can be proven. And the virus is the big one. Alot of things get the "virus" tag, even cancer. Look what they've done with the world by simple blasting VIRUS everywhere.
since were on the topic of STDs lets say you were to have unprotected sex with a woman who has a yeast infection. theres a good chance that if you were to skip a shower and go to bed you'd wake up with an itchy dink. you would in a sense catch a yeast infection right? But are is it because you caught something contagious or was it because you exposed sensitive tissue to a toxic environment.
So you would have sex with a hot hooker who has herpes? Because herpes is a virus and viruses don't exist and viruses are not contagious?
I don't claim to have all the answers, nor am i saying you are 100% correct or incorrect. All I'm saying is that Harry Vox is right in regard to it not passing the bullshit test.
I actually find the studies you link to be intriguing, worth further inspection. For now I am going to keep avoid coughing sneezing people with pox and i'm going to pass on banging the hot hooker who has herpes on her vagina.
ok i think i know what the problem is here. If you put your dink is a bacterial ridden hole then there is most definitely a chance that your sensitive skin will experience irritation. Kinda like when you get something in your eye and you get pike eye.
Things like that can be accidentally attributed to contagious pathogens. its one person getting sick from another. But its far from a "virus" or other particle that causing it. Its the environment/ and or toxins your introduced too.
So when people like me claim that there are no viruses, we are not denying that people can get sick or that people are faking said illness's. what we are saying is that the catalyst that makes the person ill isn't a "virus" because that one has never been proven to exist.
See we know bacteria are real, we can see them and isolate them, same with parasites and fungus. all of those, except the "virus" can be proven. And the virus is the big one. Alot of things get the "virus" tag, even cancer. Look what they've done with the world by simple blasting VIRUS everywhere.
since were on the topic of STDs lets say you were to have unprotected sex with a woman who has a yeast infection. theres a good chance that if you were to skip a shower and go to bed you'd wake up with an itchy dink. you would in a sense catch a yeast infection right? But are is it because you caught something contagious or was it because you exposed sensitive tissue to a toxic environment.