Comparing Hermaphroditus to a tranny is quite literally where the term hermaphrodite comes from. I get you’re into the allegorical esoteric understanding but you’re still examining a tranny allegory regardless of how you rationalize it.
A convergence of both sexes, a supposed deity that’s been worshiped since at least the 7th century BC that has both genders is transsexual by definition, and hermaphroditic by definition, so much so it is the etymological origin of the very term hermaphroditism.
Is it the oldest trans worship? No, but it’s one of the oldest.
Hermaphroditus was the alleged deity and cult of worship that has existed since the 7th century BC, the former clinical term hermaphrodite comes from that.
Just curious define the term transsexual for me because I’m curious how Hermaphroditus isn’t an example of it regardless of it being allegorical or not.
The old definition pre modern trans nonsense is “transcending both sexes”, how would your allegory not meet that criteria?
It appears the root of our confusion is modern transgender ideology. Hermaphroditus is classically transsexual because it’s an allegory or worship or something that transcends both sexes so it’s transexual in its most classical sense. Tits and a dick allegorical or not is transsexual.
Since we both are not modern transgender ideologues I figured we’d both be on the same page with a more classical definition. You seem to agree with me, despite your protests, and are battling with a modern definition and not what I’m saying.
Comparing Hermaphroditus to a tranny is quite literally where the term hermaphrodite comes from. I get you’re into the allegorical esoteric understanding but you’re still examining a tranny allegory regardless of how you rationalize it.
A convergence of both sexes, a supposed deity that’s been worshiped since at least the 7th century BC that has both genders is transsexual by definition, and hermaphroditic by definition, so much so it is the etymological origin of the very term hermaphroditism.
Is it the oldest trans worship? No, but it’s one of the oldest.
Hermaphroditus was the alleged deity and cult of worship that has existed since the 7th century BC, the former clinical term hermaphrodite comes from that.
Just curious define the term transsexual for me because I’m curious how Hermaphroditus isn’t an example of it regardless of it being allegorical or not.
The old definition pre modern trans nonsense is “transcending both sexes”, how would your allegory not meet that criteria?
It appears the root of our confusion is modern transgender ideology. Hermaphroditus is classically transsexual because it’s an allegory or worship or something that transcends both sexes so it’s transexual in its most classical sense. Tits and a dick allegorical or not is transsexual.
Since we both are not modern transgender ideologues I figured we’d both be on the same page with a more classical definition. You seem to agree with me, despite your protests, and are battling with a modern definition and not what I’m saying.