This is a great video debunking the popular “Truther” claims about Building 7. https://youtu.be/7PpsCCTMP8w
The points brought up in the video are:
• “Why wasn’t building 7 ever mentioned in the 911 Commission Reports?”**
This is because the Commission Reports were specifically about the actual targets of the attacks, not collateral damage like WTC 7. It was however investigated in a NIST report which is here https://www.nist.gov/publications/final-report-collapse-world-trade-center-building-7-federal-building-and-fire-safety-0
• “How could it collapse if it never was hit by a plane?”**
Pretty simple, huge chunks of burning debris crashed in through the top of WTC 7 from the towers. This not only caused massive structural damage, but also caused a massive fire to spread throughout WTC 7.
Truthers deceitfully only ever show pictures of it from the south, where it was not struck by debris, making it seem like it was a perfectly fine building that collapsed out of nowhere, but images of it from the north side clearly show the massive damage WTC 7 sustained from the falling debris
• “Building 7 collapsed in free fall out of nowhere! This is only possible through controlled demolition!”**
This is just an outright lie. Footage of the attack clearly shows building 7 folding in on itself over the course of hours before finally collapsing. All footage of the “free fall” conveniently only ever starts right as the building falls, it never shows the footage before of the penthouse caving in.
Remember, the truth doesn’t fear investigation.
In any case result is the same. Only globalists, USA government and Israel got profit from that event.
Details are very important, when you don't know what is happening and who is behind that. Details could give you important hint.
But when you perfectly know final result and exact beneficiaries, details could have only historical value.
So does it really important, was there real planes or not, who exactly guide them into towers if they existed and how buildings was demolished, when you already know who did that and for what purpose?
If a malevolent neighbour will set your car on fire and then will began to push for passing prohibition of cars because of fire danger in your county as a law and finally succesfully reach his goal fearmongering your neighbours - will you really be interested did he used matches or a lighter to burn your car? Did he hired somebody to do that or did that himself?
Something tell me you will be much more concerned about repealing cars ban in your county, and making such cheating with your rights fundamentally impossible in future.
And those who benefited from that legislation, obviously will try push you to endlessly discuss an irrelevant and sensless question - what exactly did your neighbour use to set your car on fire, while citizens of county will still be deprived a right to have a car.
None of this babbling post even addresses the point. Muh tower 7 is such a hallow bullshit point for conspiracy theorist. I outright address it point by point and all I get is this vague nonsense.
Your fucking hilarious. Your third point doesnt even really make sense, when the report itself says the collapse took 5.9 seconds. Show me the structural collapse of any other tall building that happens that quick. Unless the entire thing disintegrates at one time, it doent.
And lmao you think we fear the truth? We are not congressman and billionaires with the ability to ship the wreckage to china within a week of the act.
https://www.chicagotribune.com/news/ct-xpm-2002-01-27-0201270268-story.html
Oh by the way, what happened to all those lovely people who helped get all that scrap cleaned up so quickly, for free I might add, without proper protection? Oh they got their reward all right.
https://www.foxnews.com/us/9-11-first-responders-still-fighting-health-benefits-21-years-later
Kinda reminds me how I was poisoned with refrigerant and WCB told me it was not possible so they didnt have to check air quality or do anything like, get me a doctor. In fact they took the same route you did, claiming things like.
"David said if he had got an apology, he wouldnt have been injured."
What I had really said was, I dont care about the money, just give me a apology and help and that would go along way.
"David thinks the government is out to get him."
What I really said was, I cant trust anyone who works for the government after what my caseworker for wcb did to me, not to mention I told them several times I am appalachian. I have a huge distrust for the government to begin with. All they did was solidify it.
Im so schizo hehe.
I have all the evidence I need for what happened to me, I just need to force A.R.C.A., that is the appliance recycling centers of america, the canada version to push for the lawsuit, or efficiency nova scotia. Since it was their contractor, my employer that poisoned me. Cock suckers.
"And lmao you think we fear the truth?"
Yes. A big point conspiracy theorist make is this line about truth not fearing investigation, but the moment someone sits down and debates these things with you, you guys immediately start with the name calling and shitposting. Or you just get so scatter brained you cant stay on topic and start going on rants about other conspiracies as well.