19 () posted 1 year ago by pkvi 1 year ago by pkvi +20 / -1 6 comments share 6 comments share save hide report block hide replies
Right now AI is just programmed language models so whoever controls the dataset controls the answers with AI.
a) suggested data (information) tempts one to hold onto...perceivable data (inspiration) can't be held onto; only adapted to.
b) few control many by tempting many to consent to suggested information, while ignoring perceivable inspiration.
c) suggested information tempts questions and answers...perceivable inspiration represents solution (inception toward death) to any problem (life).
Classification (classic); artificial understanding (AI); dehumanization (bot)...all suggested tools of subversion tempting ones consent.
Does perceivable nature require annotation (commenting) from those within?
AN, adjective (Latin unus, una, unum; Gr)- "one" - https://webstersdictionary1828.com/Dictionary/an
Doesn't a suggested "bot" imply one suggesting it and one consenting to use it? How can a bot represent one if it implies dualism?