Free Energy? Why Files
(files.catbox.moe)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (9)
sorted by:
None of that "greatest inventions" that are so cool that have to be keept in secret by inventor from those who should be saved by this invention up to the moment of inventor's death was ever succesfully replicated.
Fuck all that "inventors". Fuck all that stupid stories and fairy tales about miraclous inventions. They are all complete bullshit. How do I know that? Easy. They have never been replicated.
I personally made a lot of those crap and none of them ever worked as an energy source. At the same time, all other things I made worked as promised in documentation if made as described. Thousands of other people tried to replicate that free energy crap without any success too.
Meanwhile, for a long time there exist a pretty cheap and long lasting power source that could independently provide enough energy to every household for centuries. Without any fairy tales and nobody even was killed for inventing that device. It was even mass-produced at some moment in history mostly for expeditions, space vehicles and far outposts. This power source named RadioIsotope ThermoElectric Generator (RITEG). Piece of radioactive material well under critical mass in lead/stainless steel case to cut any radiation surrounded by thermoelecric elements and if you need heating, water contour to heat your house. Simple as fuck, cheap, safe and robust. But guess what? Suddenly, radioactive materials in amounts decent enough to make a power source are prohibited for private persons. You already know how to make hearly free energy source. You don't need any of that fucking "inventors" with their inventions that are completely useless. What is the purpose of all that endless fairy tales carousel with "free energy inventors"? Even if top reptiloid come out and admit that they was killed by his order this will change nothing, because their "inventions" does not work. So there is no any sense in rereading all that stories again and again. Do you really need a working free energy source? So why does nobody questioning prohibition of private ownership and use of radioactive materials?
I like SciFi and fairy tales too. As an entertainment. But the same play seen thousand times become boring. Even good one. And this stories about "free energy generator inventor killed by government/corporations" are even no good ones.
There are a lot of cheaters and swindlers in engineering and science. But, fortunately, it is very easy to detect them in a field of engineering and science. If an invention could not be replicated by independent person - it is a scam. Without any options.
ok so here I'll give you this.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9q_IvxWoY4E
This is an "inventor" that is sharing his invention.
Blame the kike control system of patents but I think this is why the "inventors" tend to keep it quiet. Especially the ones post internet.
Yet here is the only one I am currently following.
And honestly plasma is the free energy we are looking for.
I remember in my early 20's I spent hours drawing a blueprint of of a Plasma rifle. The only thing I could not grasp was the how to control the energy. Making plasma is the easy part. 90's Microwaves are basically free at thrift stores.
You seem pretty educated in this field. What are your thoughts on old world buildings harnessing "lighting" or other high atmosphere energies.
At the end of the day. I think a world free of current tech and energy shackle's would progress us 10 fold.
He is not an inventor of fusor. Problem with fusors is that they eat more energy than produce. Even in terms of heat they are not better that thermal pump You need more energy to make a stream of protons or ions powerful enough to start fusion reaction than you will get from that fusion reaction. Unfortunately. And when you get to fusion, you get neutron and gamma radiation as a sideshow. Even if you choose "neutronless" reaction as main one, it will not be the only reaction you will really get. There always will be other reactions. And neutrons are nasty, because they like to make very active isotopes from nearly anything. So, "inventor" really need concrete shielding for his fusor.
So, there is clearly no self-sustained process, and there is no any proof that fusion reaction really started. He could have been demostrated radiation he got from fusion reaction, and that could be perfect proof that he really reach fusion, but he didn't.
It is undoubtfully very interesting project, but it have no real practical sense. It will not end in self-sustaining power source producing some 10 kWh of electric power working in the barn.
Star-in-a-jar is a very nice thing for weekend garage project. I like them, and build a few. They are real thermonuclear fusion reactors, working ones, with possibility to run fusion reaction as long as you wish, unlike all that fusion "breakthroughs" hyped in MSM. But they are not energy source.
Plasma is just a gas, hot enough for atoms to loose electrons.
Plasma rifle is very simple thing, really. It is just two parallel conductors with a large capacitor. You put something conductive (I played with balls of aluminium foil) between conductors, it short circuit capacitors and evapourates to a ball of plasma with a current passing through. Since that current runs through parallel conductors too, this plasma ball began to accelerate in magnetic field of conductors. It is very entertaining show, but completely useless. Plasma ball accelerates to a decent speed, but it have too low density to make any significant damage to the target. And slow down quickly in air. I get some wooden planks burning at few meters, but much smaller UV laser do that on much larger distances with much less energy consumption.
Energy of plasma projectile is proportional to energy stored in capacitors before the shot.
Harnessing lightnings works, you could get some free energy from them, you don't even need a tall building, you could get free energy just from any conductor near thunderstorm. But you need permanent thunderstorm to get constant flow of energy. Hardly anybody will agree to live in a house under constant lightning strikes to have some free energy.
Static atmospheric electricity looks cool with its 200V at the height of your head, until you measure available current. Since air is an isulator, and a decent one, that 200V you connect to will drain immidiately and you have to wait a long time while they will restore. This is why we are not electrocuted constantly walking or standing. Too low current.
Really, world should progress at 10 fold right now, even with current energy sources. Problem is that there are no any significant inventions was made since 1970. Last one was laser. Progress was artificially stopped and all that allowed to develop (only quantitatively, not qualitatively) is stupid computers. And that done not by killing some inventors who invent something, announce invention and hide invention from public, but by controlling funding for every single area of science.