WHAT AND THE LIVING SH!T! What is #142 about?
(qposts.online)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (16)
sorted by:
This is my theory. Q is/was an attempt at looking glass technology. If you have no idea about looking glasses, then look into Project Looking Glass. It (Q) was created by White Hats, but, they are trying to catch up in a game where their opponents have been using this tech for far longer. This is why it failed. If you want to get freaky deeky, then look into altering timelines (ie. CERN). IMO, Q altered TPTB timeline which is why we are where we are now. In an appearing clown world. Shit got real fucky when two forces were messing with the space continuum.
Each and every point on post 142 can be researched and understood. This story didn't begin when Q formed.
Two points to 'coming right out with statements:
let's make it 3) Don't tip the hand openly to the enemy.
Q is related to Cicada 3301, either as recruitment or opposition.
It's need was/is due to 'The Optic' by which the cabal controls with
"The Spectacle"
Speaking of Looking Glasses:
Both these sides are now on parallel plotlines to a large extent due to Looking Glass as chess program complete with black and white pieces. Offensive moves win unless the opponent knows your (every) move. And unless that team knows how to counter the counter (play defense...they don't) and how to finish while improvising (they don't)....the outcome is in question.
The Cabal timeline was 'adjusted' in a ceremony overseen by a Tibetan Supreme Council. I attest to attending by coincidence, btw.
CERN is a cy-op covering a black op.
Time is a dimensional aspect of distance and motion between objects and observer.
It permeates as factor in growth and decay.
Foundation vs Change (Obama motto)
And so Saturn, who eats his children in jealous guard of change to his rule, is worshiped by those who desire eternal life/youth.
thanks PLC. I can see why one would maybe feel Q is like that. Just as an FYI though, there are things pro and con on the idea of being able to predict the future very far ahead. On one hand, quantum mechanics says all things face quantum uncertainty that makes long prediction impossible. On the other hand, cosmology shows that big physical things can be predicted over millions of years. The big problem is the in-beween region of time, between quantum time scales and cosmic scales - we can predict only over limited time lengths. The thing is, as far as sociopolitical events are concerned, we can only predict statistically, which means we cannot make perfect predictions of outcomes. Hence all attempts to predict results of political actions have some uncertainty in them. And the further ahead you try to predict, the more uncertainty piles up. So if Q thinks it can predict far ahead it is doomed by the laws of physics to fail.
As far as the Mandela Effect and timelines, I have to say it's not likely that timelines can be retroactively altered. Although one advanced physics school of thought felt that the future affects the past and locks things into a timeline when things change. But that is not provable nor likely. I would not say Q has deep knowledge of that and is probably more fringe than solid. The past steers the path to the future, but the future doesn't reach back and change reality. It is known that if that happened it would be inconsistent with any reality, and not be creating alternate timelines.
Hey but thank you for expressing your views. I accept that.
Your actually believe there is such a thing as White Hats?
There are, but they are Syrian evildoers posing as dogooders.