thanks PLC. I can see why one would maybe feel Q is like that. Just as an FYI though, there are things pro and con on the idea of being able to predict the future very far ahead. On one hand, quantum mechanics says all things face quantum uncertainty that makes long prediction impossible. On the other hand, cosmology shows that big physical things can be predicted over millions of years. The big problem is the in-beween region of time, between quantum time scales and cosmic scales - we can predict only over limited time lengths. The thing is, as far as sociopolitical events are concerned, we can only predict statistically, which means we cannot make perfect predictions of outcomes. Hence all attempts to predict results of political actions have some uncertainty in them. And the further ahead you try to predict, the more uncertainty piles up. So if Q thinks it can predict far ahead it is doomed by the laws of physics to fail.

As far as the Mandela Effect and timelines, I have to say it's not likely that timelines can be retroactively altered. Although one advanced physics school of thought felt that the future affects the past and locks things into a timeline when things change. But that is not provable nor likely. I would not say Q has deep knowledge of that and is probably more fringe than solid. The past steers the path to the future, but the future doesn't reach back and change reality. It is known that if that happened it would be inconsistent with any reality, and not be creating alternate timelines.

Hey but thank you for expressing your views. I accept that.