Why do we have an FBI?
(www.zerohedge.com)
Comments (13)
sorted by:
to protect pedos, subvert the Constitution, and keep American Citizens from enjoying genuine prosperity. they're terrorists, parasites, and traitors.
a) what comes first...constitution or institution?
b) CON (together with) or IN (being within)?
c) STATUERE (established by) -TION (action)...what does action establish and where does action establish it?
90s fox tv propaganda had show called x-files. Tricked me into believing FBI was chasing aliens and mutants.
Believing implies ones consent to "want to believe" in the suggestions of others... https://img.gvid.tv/i/4Anhdd2d.jpg
Lots of zero hedge articles today.
a) does it matter how often (lots) one fortifies (hedge) artificial (article) nothing (zero)?
b) what if artificial nothing (suggested information) represents ones ignorance of everything natural (perceivable inspiration)?
c) what if "lots" of repetition "fortifies" suggested information within ones mind/memory?
FBI is not "Federal" any more than the Fed is. And we all know the Fed is neither Federal, nor a Reserve Bank. Same with CIA, NSA, NIH, and all the other 3-letter so-called Government agencies. They're private firms who work for the globalist elites. We only think they're for the people, because the taxpayers foot the bill.
Ones consent to suggested bureaucracy (regulations through others) represents ones FED'ERAL, adjective (Hebrew; to pledge) of submission to others; which gives others the power of ones consent to INVEST', verb [Latin investio; in and vestio, to clothe) and GATE-keep one with regulations.
Bonus: GLOW (comprehension) in the DARK (ignorance)...
We have an oligarchy of globalist criminals and the FBI is there private Gestapo.
Are many consenting to suggested rules by few?
What if few suggest globalism, which when consented to; shapes many into globalists?
If one (separated unit) consents to suggested we (collectivism); then one ignores self for others.
a) what if ones consent to the suggestions by others represents ones CREED given to others as CREDIT, which can then be SE-CRE-gated, hence kept away from one?
b) what if ones consent to suggestions by others tempts one to ignore state of resistance (within natural order) to state of follower (of suggested orders)?
c) what if a suggested CITY (Greek; polis) tempts one to consent to a center of commerce (marketplace) aka choice (consent) to choice (suggestion) contract law?
a) can temporary (life) within ongoing (inception towards death) own/posses (have) anything?
b) what if ones want to hold onto tempts one to ignore need to let go?
c) what if ones ignorance (want over need) can be exploited by others who suggest one to hold onto, while ignoring the need to let go of perceivable?