Amazon Alexa Locks "Racist" Owner Out of Smart Home
(odysee.com)
Comments (16)
sorted by:
if you buy big brother speakers ... cameras and tvs... you deserve it...
What if big BROTH; noun (bhreu; to heat; to boil) - "liquid (inception towards death) in which something (life) has been boiled"...is always watching?
The government won't put surveillance equipment in your homes.
You will do it yourself.
Ones consent to suggested equips ones mind (equipment) with the suggested; while giving those suggesting the power of ones consent to control ones mind (government) with the suggested.
That is the very cyberpunk they deserve. :)
Moral of the story, stop using proprietary big spy tech. Always look for libre opensource decentralized software. That is, if you wish to have a "smart home". Which to me, is a very dumb idea, IMO.
^ This - I literally want to start looking at antique type writters, because I seriously wonder if people can read my diary on my laptop, even though, I don't even have internet atm.(Using a mobile device currently.) I swear, there isn't one computing deivce nowadays, that doensn't have a wifi card in it...
a) source (perceivable) is open for resolution (perceiving).
b) being implies center (perceiving) of surrounding (perceivable).
c) software (inception towards death flow) generates hardware (living form).
Suggested "opensource decentralized software" tempts one to ignore this.
"He that is surety for a stranger shall smart for it: and he that hateth suretiship is sure." ~Proverbs 11:15
Edit: notice sm-"art" aka artificial (in opposition of natural).
Nobody should have racist tech. The tech is racist. It has excluded somebody in prejudice over a rant? That's racism.
TFW, the person who was locked out was of the same race as the delivery person and nothing racist was actually said.
The tech is racist. It has no grounds to exclude. That's illegal. It was prejudice to what was said. It is in no lawful position to make that judgement. Racism. Yes.
Racism is excluding somebody in prejudice. Prejudice towards race normally.
However it is nonsensical this word racism, because everybody is prejudice based on preference. It leads to discrimination here topically. Illegally. The tech is racist. It had no right.
a) reality implies all inclusive...no exclusions.
b) RACE (Latin raddix; radius; radiate; ray) implies growth from center (inward) towards surrounding (outward)...ones consent to a suggested -ism by another represses that growth.
c) if life exits in-between inception towards death motion, then death is predefined for life...motion implies prejudice to everything within.
d) somebody aka SOME, adjective - "noting a certain quantity of a thing, but indeterminate" + INDETERM'INATE, adjective - "not determinate; not settled or fixed; not definite; uncertain"...certainty (inception towards death) implies prejudice to everything uncertain (life).
a) ...was suggested by a third party; while both consenting parts (racists and non-racists) are in conflict (reasoning) against each other about it.
b) consenting to any -ISM (distinctive doctrine, theory, or practice) tempts one to ignore being distinct (partial) within indistinct (whole).
c)...does not exist within perceivable sound unless shaped into a suggestible word.
Reminds me of that scene from Mr Robot.
More tech = more vulnerabilities.
More artificial (suggested information aka words) = more vulnerability within natural (perceivable inspiration aka sound).
Some trivia...
"If I wanted the government in my living room I'd get an Alexa"
Who said it?
Stalin?