You know, the term "science" got a really bad rep because the retarded people repeating billion dollar advertising lines during the covid vaccine hysteria.
But the cool thing about "science" is its not really considered true unless multiple people can recreate the same thing for themselves.
But yes, millions and millions of people must all be in on it, because they were all super rich elite people whos only goal was the enslavement of the species.
Lol, most scientist's now are only in it for the money, but traditionally, the pursuit of knowledge and science was pursued by many for the benefit of all of mankind, not just the few elite.
Thats why those fuckers had to buy everyone off, none of them are smart enough to do it themselves, proably all those generations of inbreeding I imagine.
things that were written BEFORE the current establishment
a) current doesn't write...it offers perceivable symmetry; which those within can choose to shape suggested symbolism out of.
b) ones consent to suggestions by others establishes the suggested within ones mind (Latin mentis; ment)...establishment implies within self.
c) being implies within (life) current (inception towards death), hence in-between (life) before (inception) and after (death) aka within the momentum of motion, hence within perceivable moment(um).
in complete control of science
a) SCI'ENCE, noun [Latin scientia, from scio, to know.] + KNOWL'EDGE, noun - "perception of that which exists"...implies being partial (perceiving) within whole (perceivable); hence having the momentary opportunity to grow comprehension of perceivable...or ignore it for the suggestions by others.
b) inception towards death (flow) controls life (form); which establishes "free" will of choice within the "dom"inance of balance aka free-dom aka free (temporary growth) within dom (ongoing loss).
c) suggested scientism tempts one to ignore perceivable (Latin scio; to know).
it's not easy to trust
a) on the contrary...resisting to consent (trust) to the suggested temptations by others is way easier than choosing to resist. Being implies as resistance (life) within temptation (inception towards death)...others exploit ones ignorance thereof by suggesting one to follow orders instead of resisting the perceivable (natural) order.
b) perceiving choice within perceivable balance (need/want) can be tempted by suggested choices to imbalance (want vs not want) self. If one ignores need (perceivable) for want (suggested) by consenting; believing; agreeing; submitting; having faith in; trusting etc. the suggestions of others; then those others gain the power of ones consent over the suggested, hence being enabled to define (idolatry); redefine (revisionism) and contradict (talmudic reasoning) the suggested at will.
Edit: "The transfer you requested has been deleted." (file.io/deleted)
You know, the term "science" got a really bad rep because the retarded people repeating billion dollar advertising lines during the covid vaccine hysteria.
But the cool thing about "science" is its not really considered true unless multiple people can recreate the same thing for themselves.
But yes, millions and millions of people must all be in on it, because they were all super rich elite people whos only goal was the enslavement of the species.
Lol, most scientist's now are only in it for the money, but traditionally, the pursuit of knowledge and science was pursued by many for the benefit of all of mankind, not just the few elite.
Thats why those fuckers had to buy everyone off, none of them are smart enough to do it themselves, proably all those generations of inbreeding I imagine.
a) current doesn't write...it offers perceivable symmetry; which those within can choose to shape suggested symbolism out of.
b) ones consent to suggestions by others establishes the suggested within ones mind (Latin mentis; ment)...establishment implies within self.
c) being implies within (life) current (inception towards death), hence in-between (life) before (inception) and after (death) aka within the momentum of motion, hence within perceivable moment(um).
a) SCI'ENCE, noun [Latin scientia, from scio, to know.] + KNOWL'EDGE, noun - "perception of that which exists"...implies being partial (perceiving) within whole (perceivable); hence having the momentary opportunity to grow comprehension of perceivable...or ignore it for the suggestions by others.
b) inception towards death (flow) controls life (form); which establishes "free" will of choice within the "dom"inance of balance aka free-dom aka free (temporary growth) within dom (ongoing loss).
c) suggested scientism tempts one to ignore perceivable (Latin scio; to know).
a) on the contrary...resisting to consent (trust) to the suggested temptations by others is way easier than choosing to resist. Being implies as resistance (life) within temptation (inception towards death)...others exploit ones ignorance thereof by suggesting one to follow orders instead of resisting the perceivable (natural) order.
b) perceiving choice within perceivable balance (need/want) can be tempted by suggested choices to imbalance (want vs not want) self. If one ignores need (perceivable) for want (suggested) by consenting; believing; agreeing; submitting; having faith in; trusting etc. the suggestions of others; then those others gain the power of ones consent over the suggested, hence being enabled to define (idolatry); redefine (revisionism) and contradict (talmudic reasoning) the suggested at will.
Edit: "The transfer you requested has been deleted." (file.io/deleted)