It's like Attila the Hun. Heard that story, and the fall of Rome? Attilia would raid all the villages around the fortified cities, raid out the crops, farms, towns, killing any troops they could organise, and any mercenaries they could hire. The cities would pay king's ransom for his army to leave. They kept paying more and more, he kept coming back, free gold. Inflation hit the Romans, famine, and rioting, taxes got more and more. Eventually after years and years and years of this, Rome managed to summon another Legion, the first army was destroyed, and Attilia was wounded in battle, and then died of being drunk. But it collapsed shortly after.
But the point is, at this point are Ukraine, Attilia the hun? Are they fucking complict in causing that ignorance? At this point all they're doing is costing, and it is buying bullshit, to the point where surplus is depleted, inflation, debt. The funding is through the roof, at what a trillion plus, and counting. The other side aren't spending a fraction of that. Now let's suggest another actor entered that stage.
Almost a perfect storm. It's almost like looking at idiots. The lil piggy in the middle. Tell me that cost and what it buys? Where does this go.
Even if there was peace. It has polarised the globe for decades. No wand there, and if it loses that funding, it isn't doing much else, apart from indebting itself into a presumed victory, it would probably have to engage. Until what?
The other side can keep raiding it out. Keep raiding out the gold. It buys nothing but the fodder.
I watched the History channel. Nobody knows how he died. Except it was supposedly a celebration with fucking and drinking and he had been wounded. Did his heart give out? Was he poisoned? Did a successor challenge him? Was he dying? Or assassinated?
The point being, Ukraine are a fucking barbarian bleeding away the gold. Look Rome. Inflation, taxation, debt. But the barbarian keeps coming back every 5 minutes.
Something is very stupid here. Literal madness. What runs out first. The gold, the men, the guns. What result? It has paided them what like nearly a trillion. What happens when it fails? It's so committed to winning, if it doesn't? Then what.
The Tartary has been there for thousands of years. Prior were Scythians. The Tartars sacked Moscow prior to the Mongols in 1200? Before them was the Huns. Before that were the Scythians who dominated the same region around 500 BCE- 900 BCE. Around the time of Alexander the Great. They were in Ukraine and all over the Steppes of Asia. Alexander came from Macedonia right there near the Black Sea and Hungary, from a nomadic horse clan. Prior if we go back it was Nimrod.
The problem I have is they never went anywhere. The horselords. The simply migrated and then banned together when somebody powerful enough united them.
But the tartars have been documented for as long as the Huns? Thousands of years.
You call these kingdoms silly names like Khazaria? No idea what that is. None. Because the horselords, Tartars, Huns, Mongols, Scythians were clearly a fucking meance outside of the empires making their walled cities.
Look. Simple Google. 1700s', 1800s world map. Look at that. Dumbass. Look at that big huge area called the Tartary. It's the biggest landmass on the Planet then. This was of former Mongols. But they were called the Tartars. They're still called the Tartars today in Crimea. Like they were thousands of years ago. These same horselords then not your poxy bullshit narratives, spanned from Mongolia to Morocco at certain historic points.
I am not looking up Bullshit. You're not smart enough to look up Tartars. You're not smart enough to look up Scythians, Huns, Mongols either. Tell me about their territorial claims. Ukraine is one. Instead you've named nonsense. Khazaria invaded sacked pillaged until a Russian protectorate.
Wouldn't surprise me if this was actually an American QRF being used to backup covert ops. Seems to have the right stuff
It's like Attila the Hun. Heard that story, and the fall of Rome? Attilia would raid all the villages around the fortified cities, raid out the crops, farms, towns, killing any troops they could organise, and any mercenaries they could hire. The cities would pay king's ransom for his army to leave. They kept paying more and more, he kept coming back, free gold. Inflation hit the Romans, famine, and rioting, taxes got more and more. Eventually after years and years and years of this, Rome managed to summon another Legion, the first army was destroyed, and Attilia was wounded in battle, and then died of being drunk. But it collapsed shortly after.
But the point is, at this point are Ukraine, Attilia the hun? Are they fucking complict in causing that ignorance? At this point all they're doing is costing, and it is buying bullshit, to the point where surplus is depleted, inflation, debt. The funding is through the roof, at what a trillion plus, and counting. The other side aren't spending a fraction of that. Now let's suggest another actor entered that stage.
Almost a perfect storm. It's almost like looking at idiots. The lil piggy in the middle. Tell me that cost and what it buys? Where does this go.
Even if there was peace. It has polarised the globe for decades. No wand there, and if it loses that funding, it isn't doing much else, apart from indebting itself into a presumed victory, it would probably have to engage. Until what?
The other side can keep raiding it out. Keep raiding out the gold. It buys nothing but the fodder.
I watched the History channel. Nobody knows how he died. Except it was supposedly a celebration with fucking and drinking and he had been wounded. Did his heart give out? Was he poisoned? Did a successor challenge him? Was he dying? Or assassinated?
The point being, Ukraine are a fucking barbarian bleeding away the gold. Look Rome. Inflation, taxation, debt. But the barbarian keeps coming back every 5 minutes.
Something is very stupid here. Literal madness. What runs out first. The gold, the men, the guns. What result? It has paided them what like nearly a trillion. What happens when it fails? It's so committed to winning, if it doesn't? Then what.
I give up your mythical names.
The Tartary has been there for thousands of years. Prior were Scythians. The Tartars sacked Moscow prior to the Mongols in 1200? Before them was the Huns. Before that were the Scythians who dominated the same region around 500 BCE- 900 BCE. Around the time of Alexander the Great. They were in Ukraine and all over the Steppes of Asia. Alexander came from Macedonia right there near the Black Sea and Hungary, from a nomadic horse clan. Prior if we go back it was Nimrod.
The problem I have is they never went anywhere. The horselords. The simply migrated and then banned together when somebody powerful enough united them.
But the tartars have been documented for as long as the Huns? Thousands of years.
You call these kingdoms silly names like Khazaria? No idea what that is. None. Because the horselords, Tartars, Huns, Mongols, Scythians were clearly a fucking meance outside of the empires making their walled cities.
No they aren't a hoax.
Look. Simple Google. 1700s', 1800s world map. Look at that. Dumbass. Look at that big huge area called the Tartary. It's the biggest landmass on the Planet then. This was of former Mongols. But they were called the Tartars. They're still called the Tartars today in Crimea. Like they were thousands of years ago. These same horselords then not your poxy bullshit narratives, spanned from Mongolia to Morocco at certain historic points.
I am not looking up Bullshit. You're not smart enough to look up Tartars. You're not smart enough to look up Scythians, Huns, Mongols either. Tell me about their territorial claims. Ukraine is one. Instead you've named nonsense. Khazaria invaded sacked pillaged until a Russian protectorate.