a) yup implies versus nope aka agreement vs disagreement...a conflict of reason one is tempted to restrict ones perspective with.
Notice that you chose a side (yup, a bot); while ignoring that I didn't consent to any side (being vs not being a bot). Reasoning tempts one to view reality through the lens of a fictitious conflict; while trying to lure others with suggested labels onto either side of the conflict.
Do others have to agree or disagree with what oneself suggests they are?
b) being implies partial (perceiving) within whole (perceivable)...suggesting others to be TOTAL (whole) tempts one to ignore that.
a) yup implies versus nope aka agreement vs disagreement...a conflict of reason one is tempted to restrict ones perspective with.
Notice that you chose a side (yup, a bot); while ignoring that I didn't consent to any side (being vs not being a bot). Reasoning tempts one to view reality through the lens of a fictitious conflict; while trying to lure others with suggested labels onto either side of the conflict.
Do others have to agree or disagree with what oneself suggests they are?
b) being implies partial (perceiving) within whole (perceivable)...suggesting others to be TOTAL (whole) tempts one to ignore that.
c) consider who suggests the many to verify humanity; while doubting bots... https://img.gvid.tv/i/2EeSF3RW.jpg