ALGOR (algorism; numerical computation) ...number implies each one unit; suggested computation tempts one to add sums together, hence distracting one from self.
DECENTR (decentralism)...being implies center of surrounding; others suggest surrounding to tempt one to decentralize.
DASH (progressivism)...being moved from inception towards death implies life resisting perceivable order; others tempt one to follow suggested orders.
POLYGON (many-angled aka pluralism)...suggested angle (meeting of two lines in a point) tempts one to ignore being within (life) one line (inception towards death).
If ones lifeline is straight, then choosing to hold onto establishes a point, hence cornering self within an angle of sorrow (loss)...resisting want to hold onto; while adapting to need to let go represents "guardian angle/angel", hence preserving growth (life) within loss (inception towards death).
a) yup implies versus nope aka agreement vs disagreement...a conflict of reason one is tempted to restrict ones perspective with.
Notice that you chose a side (yup, a bot); while ignoring that I didn't consent to any side (being vs not being a bot). Reasoning tempts one to view reality through the lens of a fictitious conflict; while trying to lure others with suggested labels onto either side of the conflict.
Do others have to agree or disagree with what oneself suggests they are?
b) being implies partial (perceiving) within whole (perceivable)...suggesting others to be TOTAL (whole) tempts one to ignore that.
ALGOR (algorism; numerical computation) ...number implies each one unit; suggested computation tempts one to add sums together, hence distracting one from self.
DECENTR (decentralism)...being implies center of surrounding; others suggest surrounding to tempt one to decentralize.
DASH (progressivism)...being moved from inception towards death implies life resisting perceivable order; others tempt one to follow suggested orders.
POLYGON (many-angled aka pluralism)...suggested angle (meeting of two lines in a point) tempts one to ignore being within (life) one line (inception towards death).
If ones lifeline is straight, then choosing to hold onto establishes a point, hence cornering self within an angle of sorrow (loss)...resisting want to hold onto; while adapting to need to let go represents "guardian angle/angel", hence preserving growth (life) within loss (inception towards death).
Are you a bot
a) BOT; ROBOT (Latin robur; strength)...always liked spinach.
b) what does it say about an environment where participants are confused about each others humanity?
c) would you ask a bot: "are you a human?"
Yup total bot
a) yup implies versus nope aka agreement vs disagreement...a conflict of reason one is tempted to restrict ones perspective with.
Notice that you chose a side (yup, a bot); while ignoring that I didn't consent to any side (being vs not being a bot). Reasoning tempts one to view reality through the lens of a fictitious conflict; while trying to lure others with suggested labels onto either side of the conflict.
Do others have to agree or disagree with what oneself suggests they are?
b) being implies partial (perceiving) within whole (perceivable)...suggesting others to be TOTAL (whole) tempts one to ignore that.
c) consider who suggests the many to verify humanity; while doubting bots... https://img.gvid.tv/i/2EeSF3RW.jpg