This is a strange image, I get the feeling whoever wrote it doesnt really know what they are talking about.
Life would likely survive if the moon was not there. There is nothing that special about tides other than they made it easier for life to evolve. I dont think that earth is this super rare special thing. I think life exists throughout this universe, anywhere it can.
Also the moon does not give the earth its magnetic field. It may help maintain the field, but there is no real proof of that other than a study by one guy.
It also does not cause the seasons, thats controlled by several factors called the Milankovitch cycles. Again the moon may influence it, but I dont think it has as much influence, as say something like planet x.
The three elements of Milankovitch cycles are eccentricity, obliquity, and precession.
The main theory is that it solidified after some major impact, by said dwarf planet this person even brings up. But no, its got to be piezo electricity lol.
I actually believe that the moon may have been part of the earth once, before getting smacked.
Several different formation theories for the moon have been proposed by scientists, The story that is best supported by all the available data, however, is that the moon formed during a giant impact between the proto-Earth, and another protoplanet roughly the size of Mars, sometimes known as “Theia
It's either that, or it is like the ancient sanskrit texts which claim that the moon was towed here by a giant spaceship. Whenever this ship would come close there would be storms and things like that, so they used smaller ships to descend down from the sky.
This is one of those things i could find like pre 2012, but afterwards appears to be scrubbed off the net, I cannot trace the exact sanskrit epic that talks about this. You can find some obscure references here and there, thats about it.
Also whats the reasoning behind slamming the moon with discarded rocket parts and it ringing like a bell, and it generating electricity. Other than it could be some kind of mined out planetoid from the edge of the solar system. The fact it so closely matches earth suggests thats not true.
I also dont buy that the moons orbit is perfectly circular. Some times its super small, some times its super big.
The Moon orbits Earth in an ellipse, an oval that brings it closer to and farther from Earth as it goes around.
The farthest point in this ellipse is called the apogee and is about 253,000 miles (405,500 kilometers) from Earth on average.
Its closest point is the perigee, which is an average distance of about 226,000 miles (363,300 kilometers) from Earth.
When a full moon appears at perigee it is slightly brighter and larger than a regular full moon – and that's where we get a "supermoon".
I also like how they try to claim that mars and the moon were moons of tiamat/theia. Again proably not likely. However, something did exist between mars and jupiter. And something certainly smashed it and left the asteroid belt. Perhaps earth/moon and mars formed out of it. The more they "learn" about mars, the more it looks like it once supported life too. I remember being a kid and learning that was one of those stupid conspiracy theory's.
In the end, they talk about a twin star to earth.
Funny thing is, this is literally what zecharia sitchin was talking about with planet x lmao.
This is a strange image, I get the feeling whoever wrote it doesnt really know what they are talking about.
Life would likely survive if the moon was not there. There is nothing that special about tides other than they made it easier for life to evolve. I dont think that earth is this super rare special thing. I think life exists throughout this universe, anywhere it can.
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/moon-life-tides/
Also the moon does not give the earth its magnetic field. It may help maintain the field, but there is no real proof of that other than a study by one guy.
It also does not cause the seasons, thats controlled by several factors called the Milankovitch cycles. Again the moon may influence it, but I dont think it has as much influence, as say something like planet x.
https://www.sci.news/space/moons-nearside-farside-asymmetries-ancient-giant-impact-07213.html
The main theory is that it solidified after some major impact, by said dwarf planet this person even brings up. But no, its got to be piezo electricity lol.
I actually believe that the moon may have been part of the earth once, before getting smacked.
https://news.uchicago.edu/explainer/formation-earth-and-moon-explained
https://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-27688511
It's either that, or it is like the ancient sanskrit texts which claim that the moon was towed here by a giant spaceship. Whenever this ship would come close there would be storms and things like that, so they used smaller ships to descend down from the sky.
This is one of those things i could find like pre 2012, but afterwards appears to be scrubbed off the net, I cannot trace the exact sanskrit epic that talks about this. You can find some obscure references here and there, thats about it.
Also whats the reasoning behind slamming the moon with discarded rocket parts and it ringing like a bell, and it generating electricity. Other than it could be some kind of mined out planetoid from the edge of the solar system. The fact it so closely matches earth suggests thats not true.
I also dont buy that the moons orbit is perfectly circular. Some times its super small, some times its super big.
https://solarsystem.nasa.gov/news/922/what-is-a-supermoon/
I also like how they try to claim that mars and the moon were moons of tiamat/theia. Again proably not likely. However, something did exist between mars and jupiter. And something certainly smashed it and left the asteroid belt. Perhaps earth/moon and mars formed out of it. The more they "learn" about mars, the more it looks like it once supported life too. I remember being a kid and learning that was one of those stupid conspiracy theory's.
In the end, they talk about a twin star to earth.
Funny thing is, this is literally what zecharia sitchin was talking about with planet x lmao.
Who knows.
What he said could more readily be interpreted as a hypothetical statement in common English, meant to describe the characteristics of the crater.