Viruses come from our bodies. There is video of virus breaking out of cells You can take pictures of a virus.
But what tells you it was the virus that killed the cell? A better theory is that the cell was dying, and our RNA generated molecules that help break down the cell for easy aptosis.
Imagine you are driving along and you see a house fire. There are firemen all over the place. Then you drive along and see a building fire, again, firemen everywhere. Thus, firemen burn down buildings. THAT is the logic used connects pictures and video of viruses to illness. Its weak logic, weak science. There are many scientific books that deep dive into the topic of terrain they or cell theory. Its not an alternate theory, its just the cumaltive knowledge we have as to what causes illness
Smart people can build great theories on top of bad foundation.
Virology is a house of cards, once you understand the foundational problems with germ theory, you will see how much science gets supressed.
You say those molecules either don't exist, or don't exist in the form published by the journal? Can you show how their machinery gave false results?
Viruses come from our bodies. There is video of virus breaking out of cells You can take pictures of a virus.
But what tells you it was the virus that killed the cell? A better theory is that the cell was dying, and our RNA generated molecules that help break down the cell for easy aptosis.
Imagine you are driving along and you see a house fire. There are firemen all over the place. Then you drive along and see a building fire, again, firemen everywhere. Thus, firemen burn down buildings. THAT is the logic used connects pictures and video of viruses to illness. Its weak logic, weak science. There are many scientific books that deep dive into the topic of terrain they or cell theory. Its not an alternate theory, its just the cumaltive knowledge we have as to what causes illness