People frequently these days are relying on social media and the internet such as here for communication of important ideas, but then forgetting to disseminate it in other mediums.
Online is great for trends. You can push something out, it can go viral, and then you can get a broad audience....but a broad audience is not a well-informed audience, and they typically are not a deep audience.
If you want a deep audience, you need to have more than just online content. You need to start to publish physical copies too. Physical copies can be retained, lost and forgotten but then refound, discretely shared, copied, etc and redistributed back onto the web through unboxings, reviews, criticisms, etc.
Having a physical object also means it's a tangible thing. It has existence....you cannot shadow ban a book. So, don't discount the old mediums of paper and ink. Art too.
Though I don't disagree with your logic, I do not know many people at all that read anything from physical print publications anymore, including myself. Technology has infiltrated our lives in a way that most everyone prefers convenience over tradition. Our collective attention spans have been reduced to that of a horsefly. We want it fast, we want it easy, and we want it succinct.Though having physical copies of information makes sense, it would just collect dust on the shelf with the Encyclopedia Britannica collection and self-help books. If we ever go back to a world without the convenience of technology leading the path of communication, our problems will be much greater than trying to remember where the info notebook is and how to share its contents with a larger collective.
Yes, and I assure you. That dusty shelf copy will survive beyond the blog posts and YouTube links if the information was truly impactful.
You cannot follow hard facts when the jannies are paid to clean up faster than you can share it beyond a couple people who will then not necessarily be able to find it again, it may get blocked, or worse it could get altered.
a) if consenting to suggested on-line; then one follows in-line with the suggestions of others.
b) how can one import into while being (life) within line (inception towards death)?
Latin medius - "middle"...if the center of motion represents momentum (balance) and the center of balance represents choice, then other mediums (suggested choices) tempts ones center (perceiving choice) to ignore surrounding (perceivable balance)...
a) inception towards death implies directing whole; dividing itself into partial lives.
b) being within motion implies being run by it.
c) being temporary within ongoing implies growth stretching within loss.
d) the impact of suggested trends tempts one to follow; while being perceiving trend within perceivable impact implies need to resist impact (process of dying) as to sustain trend (living).
Is there a difference between being able to touch (tangible) and getting entangled (not easily separated) when choosing to hold onto; posses a tangible object?
Can one be in possession of self (or others) while being within motion?
If ones comprehension represents enlightenment and ones ignorance represents darkness/shadow, then ask yourself how many have books they willingly ignore to read?
How does a closed book see the light? The books one holds onto and the books others keep suggesting...which one puts the other into shadow?
Artificial (suggested) implies ones ignorance of natural (perceivable)...isn't perceivable TOO, adverb - "over; more than enough; noting excess"?