Do you think AI is going too far? It seems like AI is becoming more popular and advanced. You should see the things AI can do now: write poems https://youtu.be/QAnTG9u_7VQ https://youtube.com/shorts/bdsu3Q40wv8?feature=share, make "art", write essays, etc. (you may have heard of these things) It's also more advanced than before.
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (31)
sorted by:
Fascinating.
I still can't figure out, why people who seem to do not accept blatant lies about "covid-19" or "safe and effective vaccine" from MSM and proud of that, at the same time easily fall into believing the same blatant lies about existence of AI from the exact same sources.
Is it a new kind of selective stupidity? Here we are smart and critical, and don't believe lies abour "deadly virus", but here we instantly forgot about critical thinking and all that stuff and follow enemy narrative about existence of AI.
Guys, do you understand that there is no any AI at all? You are discussing absolutely dumb and very simple system of equations and impute non-existing properties to it. Properties this thing can't have in principle.
It is exactly like believing that when you type 2 + 2 in calculator application, your PC "understand" you and "cosciously decides" to do a math for you and show 4 instead of just executing a code that was written specifically to add given numbers.
So what is the difference between "look, COVID-19 is deadly and infectious!" or "look vaccine is safe and effective" and "look, AI could make own decisions and create new things on its own!" for you? Especially taking in account that all that comes from exactly same source.
I'm just trying to figure how that selective stupidity could possibly coexist with critical thinking in someone mind....
It depends on what you mean by AI. AI will always be an algorithm of some sort at its core. There are advances in allowing these systems to run more autonomously and handle more and more advanced decision trees. To some, this is an AI, to others, it's not. Personally I will consider it AI once the system can ingest data from its own experiences and turn those into meaningful insights. As opposed to now where sanitized data must be manually incorporated into the model
When you began to invent new meanings for some well-established term, or forced to do so, then it should be a giant red flag for any sane person.
AI means Artificial Intelligence, and it imply that there should be some intelligence in it. In all that shit that posed as AI by MSM could not be any signs of any intelligence. It is a dumb automata, that do exactly what it was programed for.
Fuking light switches does not make any "decisions" when user switch the light on or off. So does not all that "AI" crap you fall to.
That is exactly the narrative pushed over humanity. "To some this is a man, to others this is a woman".
Bullshit. It is either AI, either not. Either something artificial have real intelligence property, either not. Anything else is just a bullshit.
It can't. "System" can't have any experiences at all. By definition. This simple thing can do only two things - calculate weights in layers by back-propagation during "training" process, and use that weights to directly calculate result in case of normal propagation. There is no any room for any "expirience" or whatever property those dumbfuck try to impute to that simple system. "Expirience", or "making decisions" just not coded into this simple thing.
All AI you have today is not a bit more intelligent than a light switch on the wall.
Interesting, when WHO had been rewriting definition of vaccine multiple times - do you accepted that shit as easy as you accept that "To some, this is an AI, to others, it's not." bullshit?
"AI means Artificial Intelligence, and it imply that there should be some intelligence in it" ->> Call it automata or any other term. How do you start making biorobots that are able to think about themselves and take decisions? By starting rudimentary things like ChatGPT. That's only the beggining kiddo :)
ChatGPT, just like any other GPT models, have absolutely nothing to do with any kind of intelligence at all, including one that could be needed for biorobots or whatever.
It is like starting making omelet and cup of coffee by starting with an USB cable and VHS cassete. Go ahead and good luck.
I'm really fascinated about that insanity around non-existing AI and how many so-called "critical thinkers" fall to it. I thought coronahoax was awful revelation about real situation with critical thinking in humans. Suddenly it appeared to be pretty overestimated. Things seems to be much, much worse.