The article is pretty obviously fabricated, and not a good job of it at all. I actually checked to see if it was dated April 1.
I can't quite figure out why it was fabricated, though. My best guess is that it's a test to see who among the readership and general population can detect such a bogus story. The results do not make me optimistic.
I am entertained by the thought that you somehow believe that each of these outlets "saw this with their own eyes" or something. Sorry for not being able to put it into words, but the thought itself is undefined. Repetition does indeed form truth, for many.
We all get to believe whatever we want, and almost everyone does. Enjoy it while lasts!
The article is pretty obviously fabricated, and not a good job of it at all. I actually checked to see if it was dated April 1.
I can't quite figure out why it was fabricated, though. My best guess is that it's a test to see who among the readership and general population can detect such a bogus story. The results do not make me optimistic.
Ya ... the holohoax has thousands of books saying it happened.
Multiple sources does not equate facts if the original sources are all fake to begin with.
I am entertained by the thought that you somehow believe that each of these outlets "saw this with their own eyes" or something. Sorry for not being able to put it into words, but the thought itself is undefined. Repetition does indeed form truth, for many.
We all get to believe whatever we want, and almost everyone does. Enjoy it while lasts!