Given a powerful enough telescope, of course you would.
A common misunderstanding. The farthest you can see from the top of everest is a few hundred miles - more magnification can’t change that because the air is not completely transparent. The more of it you look through the less you can see clearly.
A good analogy is looking out towards the open ocean from underwater. At some distance from you - all you see is blackness. The distant light from the shark that is absolutely there simply can’t reach you and no amount of magnification can change that. There is too much “stuff” in the way (in the analogy, water and the things dissolved/commingling in it; in the example above, the air - which also behaves as a fluid - and the things dissolved/commingling in it.)
You don't understand basic physics
Lol. Look up diffraction/angular resolution limit. Physics isn’t for everyone, and optics are tricky!
Not really, this is more like “status quo”. It’s “basic physics”, as you said. It is not surprising that you don’t know that, as most people don’t - but that’s just because physics isn’t for everybody. Some of us genuinely like it!
Try to address the content, not resort to childish ad hominem. It just makes me sad for you, and mires communication. Viciously attack the thought, but never the thinker! Attacking the thinker is a demonstration that you weren’t competent to attack the thought. Do better if you can!
A common misunderstanding. The farthest you can see from the top of everest is a few hundred miles - more magnification can’t change that because the air is not completely transparent. The more of it you look through the less you can see clearly.
A good analogy is looking out towards the open ocean from underwater. At some distance from you - all you see is blackness. The distant light from the shark that is absolutely there simply can’t reach you and no amount of magnification can change that. There is too much “stuff” in the way (in the analogy, water and the things dissolved/commingling in it; in the example above, the air - which also behaves as a fluid - and the things dissolved/commingling in it.)
Lol. Look up diffraction/angular resolution limit. Physics isn’t for everyone, and optics are tricky!
So, this is your claim!? Lol, you are a fucking idiot and a moron.
It certainly isn't for you, that's for sure. Lol. Seriously, you're fucking retarded.
Not really, this is more like “status quo”. It’s “basic physics”, as you said. It is not surprising that you don’t know that, as most people don’t - but that’s just because physics isn’t for everybody. Some of us genuinely like it!
Try to address the content, not resort to childish ad hominem. It just makes me sad for you, and mires communication. Viciously attack the thought, but never the thinker! Attacking the thinker is a demonstration that you weren’t competent to attack the thought. Do better if you can!