they kept daily diaries, if they seen a yeti someone would have wrote about it. This picture is the back shot of one of the hikers walking ahead, you can see his trail thru the snow. The reason he looks taller is because they are standing/walking on 3+ feet of packed snow.
Dyatlov is easy when you think about it critically. The reason the Russian government is so weird about tis event is because they don't want the real truth to come out. They treat these people like hero's and purposefully poison the well with radical theories.
Take the cut on the tents. They say there tons of cuts and the hikers cut there way out of the tent. They forget to leave out that everyday someone was designated to sow holes, because it was common for equipment to puncture holes in the tent. they had a oven, axes skis tons of sharp objects all in side the tent.
they also talk about radiated clothing but leave out that one of the hikers worked at a reactor.
Another thing left out is that Igor was a loose cannon. He was wild, would argue with everyone, nearly got the whole trip cancelled because he almost got arrested.
He was also dating that chick (Zinida?) before they left, then she started "seeing" another hiker during the trip itself.
Id bet my life Igor caught them messing around late anight and a fight broke out in the tent. Thats why everyone had to abandon the tent in a rush, one of the men threw the other one and tore a massive whole thru the tent.
tensions flared and the group split, Igor might have been killed initially, he had sign of fist fighting and was messed up.
one group went to the tree line, they had signs of tramua. This was from climbing the tree to get kindle of branches. The tree had branches broken indicating someone climbed up. He might have fell and broken bones. They started a fire but it was too little to late and died of exposure.
the four by the creek bed is tricky, they seemed to live longer then the rest. They might have went back to the tent for resources because alot of them were better dressed with mix matched cloths.
my best guess for them is that they were digging a den in snow for cover from the cold wind and didn't realise they're was a running creek just under them. The snow den collapsed and they were all crushed under the weight and exposed to the river.
they kept daily diaries, if they seen a yeti someone would have wrote about it. This picture is the back shot of one of the hikers walking ahead, you can see his trail thru the snow. The reason he looks taller is because they are standing/walking on 3+ feet of packed snow.
I am not convinced of this. The figure's proportions are too odd, thighs too stubby, arms too long, torso too large. There is no one else in the photo, so who's to say only one of the campers witnessed this animal and took the photo, but didn't mention it to the others for whatever reason. Hence there would be no mention of it in their diaries.
There is actually a satirical mention of Yeti (in general) in writing attributed to the campers, some kind of made up headline written down in jest. So maybe Yeti did come up in conversation, but not this explicit encounter, maybe brought up by the witness who did not want to explicitly say they saw one, and so talk of yeti's turned to humor.
This is the guy, who removes flat earth documentaries and experiments, but promotes Big Foot and Yeti? :D
Can you find a more blurry picture next time, please? I think you can beat your previous record of stupid posts with a more blurry picture of a guy in a suit.
Question 1: How can this be a real picture when cameras focus on the center, while this one focuses on the trees on the sides?
Question 2: How can this be a real Yeti, when the "supposed Yeti" is clearly viewing the photographer and will catch up to him. Definitely in snow.
Question 3: I can do that same picture with little to no effort. Step 1: Get a big suit. Step 2: Make the camera out of focus on the suit. Step 3: Send it to you, so you can promote it here. :D Oh, right... it has to be a question: How do you know this is any reliable evidence?
Every time I click on your post it's 100% dumber than the dumbest thing I've shared. Gold material. Keep it up!
You're still making retarded shares, don't worry. There are no photographs of a flat earth that can withstand scrutiny. Just photos of the horizon from too low down to see a curve. There are plenty of photos of Sasquatch/Yeti that do withstand scrutiny. Real photos of real animals. There are also fakes, but they are revealed under scrutiny.
Why am I not surprised that a flat earther has zero understanding of how cameras work? Many old manual analog camera lens can be adjusted to focus on objects either nearer or farther away. It was a common problem, especially with cameras that had no view-finder (especially common on old cheap soviet cameras) that the lens would be focused incorrectly for the image they wish to capture, especially if the photo is taken quickly. No autofocus back then.
And here you are defending big foot. What a transformation. :D I thought you are just too stupid to get flat earth, which is basically everyone, who failed physics. But dumb enough to buy into big foot? :D I guess that's your reward for acting like a dictator when evidence was presented to you on flat earth :( - you just silenced the topic. Now, you are buying into the most obvious nonsense that has only a single picture as evidence... :D
"If your enemy is on the wrong path - let them". Here, I will even upvote your answer. Go ahead with that theory. People like you will believe anything, but test nothing. :D
Hey, you can open a discussion on that topic and pin it. You are a mod after all. I am sure you struck gold with that yeti post. You can make it more public! Now, your yeti post stands at 3?! But you can use your mod privileges to pin it at the top. Why don't you open a discussion on the yeti problem? Here - free advice. And I won't even silence you if you disagree... Imagine that...
they kept daily diaries, if they seen a yeti someone would have wrote about it. This picture is the back shot of one of the hikers walking ahead, you can see his trail thru the snow. The reason he looks taller is because they are standing/walking on 3+ feet of packed snow.
Dyatlov is easy when you think about it critically. The reason the Russian government is so weird about tis event is because they don't want the real truth to come out. They treat these people like hero's and purposefully poison the well with radical theories.
Take the cut on the tents. They say there tons of cuts and the hikers cut there way out of the tent. They forget to leave out that everyday someone was designated to sow holes, because it was common for equipment to puncture holes in the tent. they had a oven, axes skis tons of sharp objects all in side the tent.
they also talk about radiated clothing but leave out that one of the hikers worked at a reactor.
Another thing left out is that Igor was a loose cannon. He was wild, would argue with everyone, nearly got the whole trip cancelled because he almost got arrested.
He was also dating that chick (Zinida?) before they left, then she started "seeing" another hiker during the trip itself.
Id bet my life Igor caught them messing around late anight and a fight broke out in the tent. Thats why everyone had to abandon the tent in a rush, one of the men threw the other one and tore a massive whole thru the tent.
tensions flared and the group split, Igor might have been killed initially, he had sign of fist fighting and was messed up.
one group went to the tree line, they had signs of tramua. This was from climbing the tree to get kindle of branches. The tree had branches broken indicating someone climbed up. He might have fell and broken bones. They started a fire but it was too little to late and died of exposure.
the four by the creek bed is tricky, they seemed to live longer then the rest. They might have went back to the tent for resources because alot of them were better dressed with mix matched cloths.
my best guess for them is that they were digging a den in snow for cover from the cold wind and didn't realise they're was a running creek just under them. The snow den collapsed and they were all crushed under the weight and exposed to the river.
I am not convinced of this. The figure's proportions are too odd, thighs too stubby, arms too long, torso too large. There is no one else in the photo, so who's to say only one of the campers witnessed this animal and took the photo, but didn't mention it to the others for whatever reason. Hence there would be no mention of it in their diaries.
There is actually a satirical mention of Yeti (in general) in writing attributed to the campers, some kind of made up headline written down in jest. So maybe Yeti did come up in conversation, but not this explicit encounter, maybe brought up by the witness who did not want to explicitly say they saw one, and so talk of yeti's turned to humor.
It's all about proportion:
https://youtu.be/qv9SgnlYe7k
Dark Five on YT did a good short format video on this.
This is the guy, who removes flat earth documentaries and experiments, but promotes Big Foot and Yeti? :D
Can you find a more blurry picture next time, please? I think you can beat your previous record of stupid posts with a more blurry picture of a guy in a suit.
Question 1: How can this be a real picture when cameras focus on the center, while this one focuses on the trees on the sides?
Question 2: How can this be a real Yeti, when the "supposed Yeti" is clearly viewing the photographer and will catch up to him. Definitely in snow.
Question 3: I can do that same picture with little to no effort. Step 1: Get a big suit. Step 2: Make the camera out of focus on the suit. Step 3: Send it to you, so you can promote it here. :D Oh, right... it has to be a question: How do you know this is any reliable evidence?
Every time I click on your post it's 100% dumber than the dumbest thing I've shared. Gold material. Keep it up!
You're still making retarded shares, don't worry. There are no photographs of a flat earth that can withstand scrutiny. Just photos of the horizon from too low down to see a curve. There are plenty of photos of Sasquatch/Yeti that do withstand scrutiny. Real photos of real animals. There are also fakes, but they are revealed under scrutiny.
Why am I not surprised that a flat earther has zero understanding of how cameras work? Many old manual analog camera lens can be adjusted to focus on objects either nearer or farther away. It was a common problem, especially with cameras that had no view-finder (especially common on old cheap soviet cameras) that the lens would be focused incorrectly for the image they wish to capture, especially if the photo is taken quickly. No autofocus back then.
And here you are defending big foot. What a transformation. :D I thought you are just too stupid to get flat earth, which is basically everyone, who failed physics. But dumb enough to buy into big foot? :D I guess that's your reward for acting like a dictator when evidence was presented to you on flat earth :( - you just silenced the topic. Now, you are buying into the most obvious nonsense that has only a single picture as evidence... :D
"If your enemy is on the wrong path - let them". Here, I will even upvote your answer. Go ahead with that theory. People like you will believe anything, but test nothing. :D
Hey, you can open a discussion on that topic and pin it. You are a mod after all. I am sure you struck gold with that yeti post. You can make it more public! Now, your yeti post stands at 3?! But you can use your mod privileges to pin it at the top. Why don't you open a discussion on the yeti problem? Here - free advice. And I won't even silence you if you disagree... Imagine that...