You're still making retarded shares, don't worry. There are no photographs of a flat earth that can withstand scrutiny. Just photos of the horizon from too low down to see a curve. There are plenty of photos of Sasquatch/Yeti that do withstand scrutiny. Real photos of real animals. There are also fakes, but they are revealed under scrutiny.
Why am I not surprised that a flat earther has zero understanding of how cameras work? Many old manual analog camera lens can be adjusted to focus on objects either nearer or farther away. It was a common problem, especially with cameras that had no view-finder (especially common on old cheap soviet cameras) that the lens would be focused incorrectly for the image they wish to capture, especially if the photo is taken quickly. No autofocus back then.
And here you are defending big foot. What a transformation. :D I thought you are just too stupid to get flat earth, which is basically everyone, who failed physics. But dumb enough to buy into big foot? :D I guess that's your reward for acting like a dictator when evidence was presented to you on flat earth :( - you just silenced the topic. Now, you are buying into the most obvious nonsense that has only a single picture as evidence... :D
"If your enemy is on the wrong path - let them". Here, I will even upvote your answer. Go ahead with that theory. People like you will believe anything, but test nothing. :D
Hey, you can open a discussion on that topic and pin it. You are a mod after all. I am sure you struck gold with that yeti post. You can make it more public! Now, your yeti post stands at 3?! But you can use your mod privileges to pin it at the top. Why don't you open a discussion on the yeti problem? Here - free advice. And I won't even silence you if you disagree... Imagine that...
You're still making retarded shares, don't worry. There are no photographs of a flat earth that can withstand scrutiny. Just photos of the horizon from too low down to see a curve. There are plenty of photos of Sasquatch/Yeti that do withstand scrutiny. Real photos of real animals. There are also fakes, but they are revealed under scrutiny.
Why am I not surprised that a flat earther has zero understanding of how cameras work? Many old manual analog camera lens can be adjusted to focus on objects either nearer or farther away. It was a common problem, especially with cameras that had no view-finder (especially common on old cheap soviet cameras) that the lens would be focused incorrectly for the image they wish to capture, especially if the photo is taken quickly. No autofocus back then.
And here you are defending big foot. What a transformation. :D I thought you are just too stupid to get flat earth, which is basically everyone, who failed physics. But dumb enough to buy into big foot? :D I guess that's your reward for acting like a dictator when evidence was presented to you on flat earth :( - you just silenced the topic. Now, you are buying into the most obvious nonsense that has only a single picture as evidence... :D
"If your enemy is on the wrong path - let them". Here, I will even upvote your answer. Go ahead with that theory. People like you will believe anything, but test nothing. :D
Hey, you can open a discussion on that topic and pin it. You are a mod after all. I am sure you struck gold with that yeti post. You can make it more public! Now, your yeti post stands at 3?! But you can use your mod privileges to pin it at the top. Why don't you open a discussion on the yeti problem? Here - free advice. And I won't even silence you if you disagree... Imagine that...