Today's facts were yesterday's 'theories' weren't they?

The Scientific Method begins with a theory. But nobody tells you you're a 'Science theorist' and puts you in a corner. Seems like only another expert should be qualified to judge.

But this is a 'house'

'You can't say that in MY house' whether it's true or not.

This leads to closed circles of self-confirming nature, as is seen now that Q doesn't serve as guide/correction.

One of the biggest 'conspiracy theories' now on both this and GAW is that Q even exists and was real or official in any way. It's theory isn't it?
MSM says you're a conspiracy theorist. No free speech for YOU.

You gotta love how its fact that nearly every single thing projected by Q and discussed on these sites within the past couple of years was called 'conspiracy theory' when it began. GAW is called a Conspiracy site by MSM, but relegates discussion of unknowns to the 'Conspiracy' page. It's marginalization of free speech, isn't it?

"Literal Demons From Hell Are Destroying America" doesn't need 'proofs in the form of links to a MSM story, but they aren't relegated as Conspiracy Theory. Cherry picking by butt-hurt egos not willing to take the deep dive acting like junior high hall monitors.

Of course shills exist, and insert bad information. **But it should be information countering, not hall monitors throwing babies out with the bathwater. **

The proof is in the pudding that everyone eats, some indescriminately. Few can gain the secret recipe, thanks to error, mis and disinformation and finally The Gatekeepers that at least some don't need.

Ask for volunteers. Then after removing those hands from the room, begin selection of the best prospects.

A REAL discussion of REAL truths would be of such a nature that shills wouldn't be able to enter and confuse in the first place.