This is Just for You Free Will of Choice.
(youtu.be)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (5)
sorted by:
Controlled opposition...both the foundation of words (sound) and the contract to exchange words (consent meets suggestion) are being distracted from by utilizing REVERB'ERATE, verb [Latin reverbero; re and verbero, to beat.] - "to return, as sound; to send back; to echo" aka echoing words among those suggesting them (representing dissonance), instead of resonating with perceivable origin (sound).
Sleight of hand:
a) notice the suggested name "Laurel" aka laureate (King's officer for poetry) aka a smooth talker; a composer of imaginative invention aka artificial (suggested words) over natural (perceivable sound).
b) notice the artificial decor suggested as ornamentation for the viewers consent in his studio..both artificial nature (flower ring) and of course masonry (brick wall). Notice the narrowness of his eyes; the goblin ears; the bulbous nose and the name AUBREY (French Auberi; Alberich) - "ruler of elves". How to distract one who exists "INIT" (within it)? By suggesting one to consent to be "ONNIT"... https://img.gvid.tv/i/Ngpk6RV9.png
c) notice her describing the instrument of language as the leading software...yet; instruments follow the lead of sound, hence trying to hit the right notes; to grow within octave; to resonate with origin. Furthermore; ones formed (instruere) mind (ment) represents hardware (life) within software (inception towards death); hence temporary form (growth) within ongoing flow (loss).
d) when she suggests to "upgrade" she tempts others to measure (grade) each other for growth (up), which tempts ONE to ignore self for counting other ONEs, and then trying to measure up to suggested numbers instead of being an expressing unit (partial growth within whole loss).
e) to command spelling aka COMMAND, verb - "to bid; to order; to direct; to charge; implying authority, and power to control, and to require obedience" aims at controlling others with suggested spells, while tempting them to ignore being directed within the natural order of perceivable sound. An instrument (living) within sound (process of dying) cannot command origin; only express oneself until running out of breath, while resisting the impressing.
Tuning an instrument implies adapting as the temporary growth to the ongoing loss of sound...try viewing a string-instrument as ones lineage. What are the implications of oneself keep pulling such a string?
Could you please give me your opinion on if you agree or disagree with her? I can't tell from this reply. I find myself noticing that some of these are easier to hear, and some are easier to read. And, in my home we discussed that we don't agree on which falls in which category.
Neither. If you are already aware of perceivable sound underneath suggested words, and how suggested words are used to distract from perceivable sound, then you next need to tackle if perceivable sound requires agreement or disagreement from those within.
If you hear a loud sound; then does that sound require you to agree or disagree with it? Same situation; different sound...someone shouting "asshole" hence tempting you to agree or disagree with it, which both will tempt you to ignore the perceivable sound.
What you are being tempted to agree (want) or disagree (not want) with suggested (word); while ignoring to adapt (need) to perceivable (sound)?
Everything one perceives replies to perceivable nature. Only if one ignores this perceivable origin for the suggestions of others, then one starts to can't tell the differences between replies. Nature communicate itself as moving differences to each one within, and these moving differences represent the flow of constant inspiration for those within to adapt to; to draw from; to grow within.
a) both suggested incantation (hear) and spell-craft (read) distract from ones struggle to resist suggested (words) for perceivable (sound).
b) agreeing or disagreeing with suggested information is easier than adapting to perceivable inspiration. The former tempts ones submission to another; the latter requires ones resistance for self.
a) a home implies needed shelter at the center of ones surroundings. Wanting to posses a shelter (my home) tempts one to ignore being processed within ones surrounding. One needs to let go of wanting...the ongoing process (dying) teaches that to each temporary one within (living). Some waste an entire life without learning that.
b) suggested "we" (plural) tempts perceiving "one" (singular) to ignore self. Each one represents an OFF-spring of another one...hence not together with others, but apart from one another.
Try discussing these topics and compare the different states of comprehension among yourselves.
tl; dr...what she's saying is valid and it's being utilized by the few to subvert the many; yet how it's being presented to the consenting viewer/listener will keep them under the subversive spell.
Self discernment cannot be taught by others...only be grown by one-self.