I have no problem admitting that a model that needs 99% of existence to be made up of invisible matter and energy is not a good model...but it's not as though the existance of "space" is predicated on it; it's one of many competing models for the creation of space and it could well be incomplete or simply wrong.
I have no problem admitting that a model that needs 99% of existence to be made up of invisible matter and energy is not a good model...but it's not as though the existance of "space" is predicated on it; it's one of many competing models for the creation of space and it could well be incomplete or simply wrong.
That doesn't equate to "space doesn't exist".
correct. thank you.