Win / Conspiracies
Conspiracies
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Conspiracies Conspiracy Theories & Facts
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

2
()
posted 2 years ago by pkvi 2 years ago by pkvi +5 / -3
3 comments share
3 comments share save hide report block hide replies
Comments (3)
sorted by:
▲ 2 ▼
– ChippingToe 2 points 2 years ago +2 / -0

They're just gonna absorb all the big cryptos and then all the shitcoins, watch. They might buy people out at above market value. Then all the crypto tards in the world will suddenly have a stake in CBDC's success, and from there it's over.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Questionable 2 points 2 years ago +2 / -0

You have us asking ourselves this Question at least once a week.

And the coins you are thinking of are Etherium and all the other junk coins out there that don't have a public ledger or payments for proof of work.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– aquila_calvitium 1 point 2 years ago +1 / -0

Banks started to use computers all the way back in 1970's, your paper checks was in fact the worlds first digital currency, which you interacted with physically through a bank worker, but they where always in control over your holdings and the back end transactions happened digitally.

Have you ever asked yourself why, if they wanted to introduce CBDC, they would give up all the control they already claimed over 40 years, just to give it all back to you. And then while at it also lose their insanely high transaction fees, like the 6% you pay on every card transaction for instance, or 20% on a international transfer, or $10/mo just to have a fricki'n bank account.

The only way they could possibly succeed using this strategy is through subversion, i.e spread FUD and make people think it's dangerous to be in control over their own money, because by now a lot of people are used to bankers being in control and want to keep it that way, because they believe that the bankers will save them if they get scammed, which of course no bank will ever do. You'd still get fucked and lose everything you own.

permalink save report block reply

GIFs

Conspiracies Wiki & Links

Conspiracies Book List

External Digital Book Libraries

Mod Logs

Honor Roll

Conspiracies.win: This is a forum for free thinking and for discussing issues which have captured your imagination. Please respect other views and opinions, and keep an open mind. Our goal is to create a fairer and more transparent world for a better future.

Community Rules: <click this link for a detailed explanation of the rules

Rule 1: Be respectful. Attack the argument, not the person.

Rule 2: Don't abuse the report function.

Rule 3: No excessive, unnecessary and/or bullying "meta" posts.

To prevent SPAM, posts from accounts younger than 4 days old, and/or with <50 points, wont appear in the feed until approved by a mod.

Disclaimer: Submissions/comments of exceptionally low quality, trolling, stalking, spam, and those submissions/comments determined to be intentionally misleading, calls to violence and/or abuse of other users here, may all be removed at moderator's discretion.

Moderators

  • Doggos
  • axolotl_peyotl
  • trinadin
  • PutinLovesCats
  • clemaneuverers
  • C
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2025.03.01 - 9slbq (status)

Copyright © 2024.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy