Is WHO a front organization for the takeover of US government? -- Sott.net
Analysts warn that the ratification of the World Health Organization's (WHO) pandemic treaty and amendments to the International Health Regulations could strip away sovereignty from nation-states and place public health decision-making power in...
Me personally, I am a sheep dog when it comes to my friends and families. Most of the people in America I couldn't give a shit about. It may just be that with us no longer being a high trust and cohesive society; the sheep dogs are protecting what they can. I could also just be an ass hole.
Yep, it is amazing what can be accomplished with small incremental change over time.
Criminals run everything, there has never been a hero in history, feel free to prove me wrong somehow.
heh yea I seen that one go by, fun times.
Had another one was a play on yours also.
This is the type of assault tactics being used across the spectrum, first the full on retarded then it gets refined continually until it works.
a) a controlled (govern) mind (ment) implies already being taken over...
b) consenting to suggested US (plural) tempts perceiving one (singular) to ignore self for submission to others...
What if ORGAN represents reacting instruments within, while -ATION represents enacting nature surrounding those within?
Can the whole (world) be sick or could it be the partials within getting sick by ignoring the natural order of the whole?
If nation represents "a people", then state of a people implies separated from one another...not collected under the suggested umbrella of a nation (national-ism).
Consenting to be "of" a nation ignores sovereignty of each one among other people.
you are fucking insane. none of your comments make any kind of sense to anyone.
a) being a person (per sonos; by sound) implies insane (in sanus; within sound)? If one is able to hear sound; then how could one not be within audible surrounding, hence within sound (in sanus)?
b) who suggested you to put "fucking" and "insane" together and why did you consent to use it? Furthermore; why put psychoanalytic suggestion (insane) together with emotional accusation (fucking)?
Are you aware that a so called jew (sigismund schlomo freud) is called "the father of psychoanalysis" or that jewish marketing pushed the "fuck" subversion of moralism aka holy fucking shit; jesus fucking christ; fuck yeah; go fuck yourself; motherfucker; for the love of fuck; fuck the police etc. ?
c) What if the "you" was perceivable before "are" could be suggested? Why make suggestions about something already perceivable?
a) why make suggestions about the comments of others in the name of "anyone" else, instead of writing "your comments don't make any kind of sense to me"? Could it represent a litigious practice? A liability clause?
b) how can one read something without utilizing senses? How could anything perceptible not make sense? Where do you think the rhetoric "doesn't make sense" originate from and who's benefiting from using it?
a) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bWFwZy8avq0
b) alphabet aka ABC aka abecedarian aka ABraCaDabra...is it magic?
Doris Day - "it's magic" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JRp1LZOk05o (written by sammy cahn aka samuel cohn)