Yes, which exactly why you framed your disingenuous argument that way. Nothing about it indicates a final conclusion, regardless of you implying such.
The investigation is on-going as they have sufficient reasonable suspicion of illegal acitivy to proceed with their investigation; issuing additional subpoenas, etc. It's only been ~100 days. The party is just getting started which is why you're trying to shut down people's interest now. lol
Unfortunately for you, it won't work. #Sorrynotsorry
So long as you agree they have sufficient reasonable suspicion of illegal activities to continue with their investigation.
E - u/Eisenhorn In response to your reply below: Oh, you seem confused. I was supporting my claim, not yours. lmao I told you already .. No more shekels from me today. lmao
The report does not make any allegations of illegal activity. I suggest you read it.
Do you understand that it is impossible to prove a negative?
Yes, which exactly why you framed your disingenuous argument that way. Nothing about it indicates a final conclusion, regardless of you implying such.
The investigation is on-going as they have sufficient reasonable suspicion of illegal acitivy to proceed with their investigation; issuing additional subpoenas, etc. It's only been ~100 days. The party is just getting started which is why you're trying to shut down people's interest now. lol
Unfortunately for you, it won't work. #Sorrynotsorry
So you agree that they have not found any illegal activities?
So long as you agree they have sufficient reasonable suspicion of illegal activities to continue with their investigation.
E - u/Eisenhorn In response to your reply below: Oh, you seem confused. I was supporting my claim, not yours. lmao I told you already .. No more shekels from me today. lmao
Why should I agree to that? Facts are not dependent on opinions.
Does the report make allegations about illegal activities by the Biden family?
If yes, can you provide a quote?