Well, I didn't hear that from the video, but clearly he is trying to cover up that he went with a ladyboy prostitute in Thailand.
But clearly this guy is very twisted. They literally used his face for the German anti-jew posters. :D You just gotta find him cunningly rubbing his hands.
You may be right. I do agree, that it is possible.
But you said it with 100% certainty the first time, of which you had no proof. I was like that once. My girlfriend helped me with stopping myself to conclude what I only suspected. I could base it on external information and statistically, it would show a greater percentage. But if I state it as a 100% certainty and then it turns out it is not 100%, I look like a loony. Do you see my point?
Bottom line, you are correct to assume. But you are INCORRECT to assume that is a fact without the required proof.
Just think of it as a special detective. The information in the video is enough to investigate the subject, not to incarcerate it, right? More investigation is needed before the judgement.
If you continue this, you would risk what I endured while trying to convince others. When they see you have no absolute proof, they will turn against you - "Look how this guy inverts the information to reach some grand conclusion" - they would probably say. What if you can state only what you know and add nothing to it? What if you wrote "Look at this Ari jew guy, who is clearly exposing himself that he went to a trans show alone in Thailand... Isn't that kinda strange? He also was alone and doesn't disclose the age of the trans prostitute he admits he hired... Isn't that kinda strange?" Now, that would be worthy to check out, wouldn't you agree? And I didn't use any lies or conclusions without proof, right? This is something I strongly advise you to practice.
Jew Goblin demon Ari Shaffir brags about raping underage boy in Thailand https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NIu0afI3SyU
Well, I didn't hear that from the video, but clearly he is trying to cover up that he went with a ladyboy prostitute in Thailand.
But clearly this guy is very twisted. They literally used his face for the German anti-jew posters. :D You just gotta find him cunningly rubbing his hands.
A ladyboy prostitute in Thailand is underage.
Do you think the boy was over 18? Don't be naive.
These pedophile gay jews go to foreign countries, fuck little boys, then come back to the USA and laugh about it.
You may be right. I do agree, that it is possible.
But you said it with 100% certainty the first time, of which you had no proof. I was like that once. My girlfriend helped me with stopping myself to conclude what I only suspected. I could base it on external information and statistically, it would show a greater percentage. But if I state it as a 100% certainty and then it turns out it is not 100%, I look like a loony. Do you see my point?
Bottom line, you are correct to assume. But you are INCORRECT to assume that is a fact without the required proof.
Just think of it as a special detective. The information in the video is enough to investigate the subject, not to incarcerate it, right? More investigation is needed before the judgement.
If you continue this, you would risk what I endured while trying to convince others. When they see you have no absolute proof, they will turn against you - "Look how this guy inverts the information to reach some grand conclusion" - they would probably say. What if you can state only what you know and add nothing to it? What if you wrote "Look at this Ari jew guy, who is clearly exposing himself that he went to a trans show alone in Thailand... Isn't that kinda strange? He also was alone and doesn't disclose the age of the trans prostitute he admits he hired... Isn't that kinda strange?" Now, that would be worthy to check out, wouldn't you agree? And I didn't use any lies or conclusions without proof, right? This is something I strongly advise you to practice.