Surrounding (inception towards death) communicates itself through center (life). Living springs off from within process of dying.
inability to live on
IN (being within) ABLE (being enabled by) -ITY (a suffix) aka SUB (from under) FIGERE (to fasten).
will come to a crossroad of problems
a) problems (life) within solution (inception towards death).
b) road (inception towards death) cross (need/want) aka ones choice within balance.
c) being free "will" of choice within cross (need/want) road (inception towards death), while being tempted by what others suggest "will come"...
understand the spiritual
Spirit (Latin spiro; to breathe) implies ones resistance within incoming (perceivable), not ones submission to "stand under" (suggested)...
our belief that if you're not spiritually connected
a) believing (want) or disbelieving (not want) connects one through choice (consent) to choice (suggestion) contract law to others, while ignoring that nature sets each one within apart from one another.
b) breathing (spirit) implies force of velocity coming in, then meeting force of resistance when being pushed out, hence representing ones struggle for apartheid (living) within wholeness (process of dying) aka center resisting surrounding.
c) reason (belief vs disbelief) contradicts implication (if/then)...if one resists want to reason, then need of adapting to implication grows ones resistance.
reality of how to
"how" represents ones struggle of self discernment, while being (life) within reality (inception towards death)...suggested "to" (towards outcome) tempts one to ignore being within, and therefore a response to perceivable origin.
will not make it
a) if will represents want, then need (inception towards death) makes want (life), hence ones struggle to need to resist wanted temptations.
Consider if FREE (implies within dominance) WILL (aka want implies need) OF (implies out of, hence within) CHOICE (implies within balance)?
b) what does "not wanting" reality imply for being within needed reality? Could it represent ignorance aka IN (opposite of) GNARUS (awareness)?
Surrounding (inception towards death) communicates itself through center (life). Living springs off from within process of dying.
IN (being within) ABLE (being enabled by) -ITY (a suffix) aka SUB (from under) FIGERE (to fasten).
a) problems (life) within solution (inception towards death).
b) road (inception towards death) cross (need/want) aka ones choice within balance.
c) being free "will" of choice within cross (need/want) road (inception towards death), while being tempted by what others suggest "will come"...
Spirit (Latin spiro; to breathe) implies ones resistance within incoming (perceivable), not ones submission to "stand under" (suggested)...
a) believing (want) or disbelieving (not want) connects one through choice (consent) to choice (suggestion) contract law to others, while ignoring that nature sets each one within apart from one another.
b) breathing (spirit) implies force of velocity coming in, then meeting force of resistance when being pushed out, hence representing ones struggle for apartheid (living) within wholeness (process of dying) aka center resisting surrounding.
c) reason (belief vs disbelief) contradicts implication (if/then)...if one resists want to reason, then need of adapting to implication grows ones resistance.
"how" represents ones struggle of self discernment, while being (life) within reality (inception towards death)...suggested "to" (towards outcome) tempts one to ignore being within, and therefore a response to perceivable origin.
a) if will represents want, then need (inception towards death) makes want (life), hence ones struggle to need to resist wanted temptations.
Consider if FREE (implies within dominance) WILL (aka want implies need) OF (implies out of, hence within) CHOICE (implies within balance)?
b) what does "not wanting" reality imply for being within needed reality? Could it represent ignorance aka IN (opposite of) GNARUS (awareness)?
Aka Cristóbal Colon (sephardic) aka cohen (hebrew kohen)...