a) "free" will of choice exits before one can choose between truth and lies, hence one being already set "free".
b) suggested "because" (being cause) tempts one to ignore being effect (perceiving) within cause (perceivable), hence representing free will of choice to react.
chain of events
If one came to be, then one isn't chained to what comes (events), but free to express choice.
EVENT', noun [Latin eventus, evenio; e and venio, to come.] - "that which comes".
Ones consent to the suggestions by others represents the self imposed chain aka RELIGION (Latin religio; to bind anew)...suggesting "just two more weeks" tempts one to chain self to it with hope (want) or fear (not want).
Sudan has been a story of conflict as far back as ancient Egypt.
But in particular since it got turned into a country. Welfare aid programs since as far back as ever. Until it further split, fighting ceaselessly. Has since been a hotbed of warfare. But it has always been historically. Even under Islam and prior.
What is driving it today are prices rising. It led to a coup, and has since caused competing warfare between rival factions both promising better governance. Sponsored by competing influences perhaps.
But it has always been this, ever since ancient Egypt and the upper and lower kingdoms. It faired better under tyrants, until they turned and have often been crushed by rivals and competing influences. It as a geographical area has almost always been in conflict.
I still don't know who or what you're blaming in your video. The region, please take some responsibility.
The only thing you hear from mainstream media about Sudan is fearmongering,
they are pushing narratives of potential high risk of Biological Hazard through a BioLab leak.
I blame the bloodline elites who pull the strings from the shadows, a cabal that wants to start the next Plandemic in Sudan through proxy warfare.
No. I disagree. It's runoff undoubtedly. Food inflation. Debt. It will spill more, globally, as prices keep rising.
It's always places where conflict is currently in that are fanned first. They're in or no strangers to conflict.
West is retreating. No point staying until it stabilises.
But Sudan has always been that hotbed for thousands of years.
Okay in the last few decades, it split into separate countries, and they have been in constant warfare. Prior to any split the same.
Yes regionally there is the competition, Chinese base, nearby, Russian proposal. Different creditors and sponsors. But it isn't the half of it. Where the region has just been harsh. If it finds peace it's because a warlord gifted it. Seriously. Not quite but as far back as everybody recalls has been this about Sudan. Those aid programs go back to the 50s and they go back further, with the creation of Oxfam. Sudan was the first place right?
a) "free" will of choice exits before one can choose between truth and lies, hence one being already set "free".
b) suggested "because" (being cause) tempts one to ignore being effect (perceiving) within cause (perceivable), hence representing free will of choice to react.
If one came to be, then one isn't chained to what comes (events), but free to express choice.
EVENT', noun [Latin eventus, evenio; e and venio, to come.] - "that which comes".
Ones consent to the suggestions by others represents the self imposed chain aka RELIGION (Latin religio; to bind anew)...suggesting "just two more weeks" tempts one to chain self to it with hope (want) or fear (not want).
No it completely isn't.
Food inflation. Debt. Competition.
Sudan has been a story of conflict as far back as ancient Egypt.
But in particular since it got turned into a country. Welfare aid programs since as far back as ever. Until it further split, fighting ceaselessly. Has since been a hotbed of warfare. But it has always been historically. Even under Islam and prior.
What is driving it today are prices rising. It led to a coup, and has since caused competing warfare between rival factions both promising better governance. Sponsored by competing influences perhaps.
But it has always been this, ever since ancient Egypt and the upper and lower kingdoms. It faired better under tyrants, until they turned and have often been crushed by rivals and competing influences. It as a geographical area has almost always been in conflict.
I still don't know who or what you're blaming in your video. The region, please take some responsibility.
The only thing you hear from mainstream media about Sudan is fearmongering, they are pushing narratives of potential high risk of Biological Hazard through a BioLab leak.
I blame the bloodline elites who pull the strings from the shadows, a cabal that wants to start the next Plandemic in Sudan through proxy warfare.
No. I disagree. It's runoff undoubtedly. Food inflation. Debt. It will spill more, globally, as prices keep rising.
It's always places where conflict is currently in that are fanned first. They're in or no strangers to conflict.
West is retreating. No point staying until it stabilises.
But Sudan has always been that hotbed for thousands of years.
Okay in the last few decades, it split into separate countries, and they have been in constant warfare. Prior to any split the same.
Yes regionally there is the competition, Chinese base, nearby, Russian proposal. Different creditors and sponsors. But it isn't the half of it. Where the region has just been harsh. If it finds peace it's because a warlord gifted it. Seriously. Not quite but as far back as everybody recalls has been this about Sudan. Those aid programs go back to the 50s and they go back further, with the creation of Oxfam. Sudan was the first place right?