Sounds like something that 1) can’t actually be corrected for even if you design a bioweapon and 2) isn’t remotely true, since you’d see either an asymptotic or a logarithmic rise in deaths, and we’ve seen neither.
Eh, we’ll see. Someone else claimed 1.5 billion dead, directly attributable to the shots, by the end of 2025. It’s not going to happen, but it’ll be funny for five seconds when January 1, 2026 comes around and they’re proven wrong, just to have them turn around and claim something else and pretend they never said anything other than their new narrative.
Oy vey!
This attempts to prevent South Korea acquiring them, themself.
South Korea could have nukes tomorrow if it weren't for American nukes protecting them.
There are pros and cons for any choice.
Good.
About 80% of the world’s population took them. It’s fairly safe to say at this point that they weren’t designed to kill. Change, sure. Kill, no.
Sounds like something that 1) can’t actually be corrected for even if you design a bioweapon and 2) isn’t remotely true, since you’d see either an asymptotic or a logarithmic rise in deaths, and we’ve seen neither.
Eh, we’ll see. Someone else claimed 1.5 billion dead, directly attributable to the shots, by the end of 2025. It’s not going to happen, but it’ll be funny for five seconds when January 1, 2026 comes around and they’re proven wrong, just to have them turn around and claim something else and pretend they never said anything other than their new narrative.
You know, like the Qult.
Let’s hope.
Confirmed zap alt account. He's the only one continuously pushing these made up jab numbers lmao. Clever way to move the death goal post tho.
Did you reply to the wrong comment?