which one of you did this?
(media.scored.co)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (14)
sorted by:
That dude that always replies with dictionary definitions of words, rather than a coherent post. Can't remember his name.
that account is mostly a bot that escaped from r/iam14andthisisdeep.
"less of a human"... an improvement over being called a bot.
u/free-will-of-choice/
a) what if the want for coherence (sticking together) tempts one to ignore the need to sustain apartheid aka being partial (life) within whole (inception towards death)?
b) what if coherence (inception towards death) generates incoherence (life) aka different partials within same whole? Wouldn't that allow one the choice to hold onto or let go of things?
a) does nature offer words or does it offer sound, which allows those within to shape words out of it? What if words cannot define anything that wasn't already there? What if ones consent to words tempts one to ignore the sound that exits before?
b) if PHONETICIANS (from phonics, sound) adapt to sound, then what if those who adapt to definitions aka DEAF-PHONETICIANS are ignoring sound for words?
c) why do dictionary definitions change and why do the many reason about changing definitions, while struggling to keep up with the contradicting changes?
d) what if sound needs to be let go; while words tempt one to want to hold onto them?
a) what if "free-will-of-choice" doesn't represent a suggested name, hence confusing those who want to hold onto suggested words; definitions; brands; idols...spell-craft?
b) does one need to REspond to MEMory, hence contemplating suggested information or does memory need to respond to input, hence adapting to perceivable inspiration?
There he is!
Lel.