It will be opposite, really. As soon as they will try to really use something their dumb neural networks will produce, there will appear a huge demand for those who will be able to fix all that mess. And no, script monkeys they will try to replace with neural network will not be able to fix it. They will need much more skilled and much more expensive professionals to repair (or rebuild from scratch) things they broke.
Artificial neural networks are too dumb to account for consequences of using one or another solution. And any tech is not just combining random patterns, but also thinking about how one solution will interfere with others and so on.
First. There are no "AI" exist at all. Thing they pose as "AI" have nothing to do with "Intelligence". It is very simple and absolutely dumb thing that just "produce" most probable result from all data it was trained on. Nothing more.
Second. Even bottom tier workers have some intelligence unlike that fake "AI". They at least could identify new situations when something go wrong. That fake "AI" can't do that because it wasn't trained on that new situations because they are new. Fake "AI" is incapable to deal with new things in principle. So even lowest possible tiers of workers could not be replaced with that fake "AI". There is a lot of issues of that kind even with simple automation, and with fake "AI" things will be much worse, because propaganda narratives about "AI" create an illusion of fake "AI" abilities. Misguided bu that propaganda will inevitably fuck things up.
Third. When that stupid thing with "AI" eventually fail, the number of bottom tier workers necessary to fix all that mess and try to somehow continue production will be much more than before because when you replace one worker with a robot, and then a robot fails, you need more than one worker to replace robot, because all stuff needed to make one worker enough for that operation was removed when robot was installed,
The chat bots are a form of "AI". You are mistaking a neural network with a general intelligence. All magazines are reading material, not all reading material are magazines.
And ive met bottom workers that arent as smart as the chatbots.
You are mistaking a neural network with a general intelligence.
If you are not aware, "AI" other than neural networks does not exist. In the past, there was huge efforts applied to computer science and programmer startups to shut down anything connected with expert systems, self-categorisation, inventing algorithms, and other stuff that is different from neural networks and magnitudes of order closer to intelligence than stupid neural networks.
Fucking chatbot is a dumb neural network that trained on internet content that just show you compilation of most probable phrases it was trained on suitable for your request. Nothing more.
And ive met bottom workers that arent as smart as the chatbots.
Unlike chatbots they could deal somehow with something they never met.
It will be opposite, really. As soon as they will try to really use something their dumb neural networks will produce, there will appear a huge demand for those who will be able to fix all that mess. And no, script monkeys they will try to replace with neural network will not be able to fix it. They will need much more skilled and much more expensive professionals to repair (or rebuild from scratch) things they broke.
Artificial neural networks are too dumb to account for consequences of using one or another solution. And any tech is not just combining random patterns, but also thinking about how one solution will interfere with others and so on.
We will see a lot of circus with solutions like that - https://acidcow.com/pics/64081-the-most-epic-construction-fails-ever-48-pics.html
You could easily make parallels into any other tech you know.
They are only going to use AI to replace the bottom tier workers to create more poor to accentuate their class warfare bs.
First. There are no "AI" exist at all. Thing they pose as "AI" have nothing to do with "Intelligence". It is very simple and absolutely dumb thing that just "produce" most probable result from all data it was trained on. Nothing more.
Second. Even bottom tier workers have some intelligence unlike that fake "AI". They at least could identify new situations when something go wrong. That fake "AI" can't do that because it wasn't trained on that new situations because they are new. Fake "AI" is incapable to deal with new things in principle. So even lowest possible tiers of workers could not be replaced with that fake "AI". There is a lot of issues of that kind even with simple automation, and with fake "AI" things will be much worse, because propaganda narratives about "AI" create an illusion of fake "AI" abilities. Misguided bu that propaganda will inevitably fuck things up.
Third. When that stupid thing with "AI" eventually fail, the number of bottom tier workers necessary to fix all that mess and try to somehow continue production will be much more than before because when you replace one worker with a robot, and then a robot fails, you need more than one worker to replace robot, because all stuff needed to make one worker enough for that operation was removed when robot was installed,
The chat bots are a form of "AI". You are mistaking a neural network with a general intelligence. All magazines are reading material, not all reading material are magazines.
And ive met bottom workers that arent as smart as the chatbots.
If you are not aware, "AI" other than neural networks does not exist. In the past, there was huge efforts applied to computer science and programmer startups to shut down anything connected with expert systems, self-categorisation, inventing algorithms, and other stuff that is different from neural networks and magnitudes of order closer to intelligence than stupid neural networks.
Fucking chatbot is a dumb neural network that trained on internet content that just show you compilation of most probable phrases it was trained on suitable for your request. Nothing more.
Unlike chatbots they could deal somehow with something they never met.