I am not sure what you mean by that exactly. Parchment reference?
The Constitution is just a piece of parchment. It’s meaningless. It doesn’t grant rights. Not in the text, and not in the physical world. It merely recognizes self-evident rights that are logically derived from the natural order. People defend those natural rights. Or they don’t.
And we won’t. That’s all there is to it. “The Constitution will save us!” is psychopathy created by communists to trick half of their false dichotomy into complacency.
After reviewing a dozen of your comments
Wish there was a way for people to see the best, rather than “the most recent”…
the right of a person to be free from unwarranted publicity,
the unwarranted appropriation or exploitation of one’s personality,
the publicizing of one’s private affairs with which the public has no legitimate concern, or
the wrongful intrusion into one’s private activities in such manner as to outrage or cause mental suffering, shame or humiliation to a person of ordinary sensibilities.
See Hogin v. Cottingham, 533 So. 2d 525 (Ala. 1988).
The right of privacy has two main aspects:
the general law of privacy, which affords a tort action for damages resulting from an unlawful invasion of privacy; and
the constitutional right of privacy which protects personal privacy against unlawful governmental invasion.
Constitutional Right to Privacy
There are two types of privacy interests that may be constitutionally protected:
the individual interest in avoiding disclosure of personal matters, and
the interest in independence in making certain types of important decisions.
Which in turn, sounds unconstitutional.
Pieces of cloth don’t matter.
I am not sure what you mean by that exactly. Parchment reference?
Side note: After reviewing a dozen of your comments, I decided I like the cut of your jib. Subscribe.
The Constitution is just a piece of parchment. It’s meaningless. It doesn’t grant rights. Not in the text, and not in the physical world. It merely recognizes self-evident rights that are logically derived from the natural order. People defend those natural rights. Or they don’t.
And we won’t. That’s all there is to it. “The Constitution will save us!” is psychopathy created by communists to trick half of their false dichotomy into complacency.
Wish there was a way for people to see the best, rather than “the most recent”…
The right of privacy is:
the right of a person to be free from unwarranted publicity,
the unwarranted appropriation or exploitation of one’s personality,
the publicizing of one’s private affairs with which the public has no legitimate concern, or
the wrongful intrusion into one’s private activities in such manner as to outrage or cause mental suffering, shame or humiliation to a person of ordinary sensibilities.
See Hogin v. Cottingham, 533 So. 2d 525 (Ala. 1988).
The right of privacy has two main aspects:
the general law of privacy, which affords a tort action for damages resulting from an unlawful invasion of privacy; and
the constitutional right of privacy which protects personal privacy against unlawful governmental invasion.
Constitutional Right to Privacy
There are two types of privacy interests that may be constitutionally protected:
the individual interest in avoiding disclosure of personal matters, and
the interest in independence in making certain types of important decisions.
https://www.stimmel-law.com/en/articles/legal-right-privacy