I always wondered.
Why are there not many "records" of Caligula that aren't made-up? Why is that all we hear about these Roman Emperors is how they are insane rapists and pedos? Is it because we've been occupied by the Blood god-worshiping Canaanite Jews since around 500AD and we've been deluded into thinking that their blood god is somehow our savior?
(Meanwhile, the blood-god worshiping Jews aka the Vatican starving people to death for hundreds of years, hiring child soldiers they call knights and paladins and destroying all historical records is glossed over.)
It mirrors what is happening nowadays recently. Tell a lie big enough, it becomes immutable truth. If they can make us believe that Baal and Dionysus is our savior and sheperd, what stops them from making us believe that genders are mere constructs and American presidents are insane racists?
It's probably the same reason they hate every Emperor. They assume themselves to be god by bloodline, a perversion and fornication, when the banks do that, act as god, electing our figureheads who pretend to have public interests when all they do is move any wealth offshore.
Almost every Emperor and Monarch except some of the few giving rise to civilization, or innovation like the bank, have been cast as tyrants.
The entire Roman bullshit theme is the stuff of conjecture. Hated by a senate assuming democracy, because of the wars and calamity, or usurpation and decline. In either event those records have been relayered. Christ didn't start any timeline, it's an obvious inaccuracy. How wrong are the records. Who cares when you won't find the truth.
It's better to believe they were mad than become Napoleon? You'll only be accused of being the Antichrist.